, Research Paper

George is described as & # 8220 ; little and speedy, dark of face, with ungratified eyes and crisp strong characteristics & # 8221 ; , which instantly draws contrast with Lennie, showing that where Lennie is simple and slow, George is more mentally able and has a dominant place in their relationship. Because of his R? lupus erythematosus of Lennie & # 8217 ; s carer, and therefore that much of George & # 8217 ; s conversation is about Lennie, we learn small about him through his existent conversations with people. His merely extended meaningful conversations are with Slim, and surely do Centres on Lennie, a clear index that much of George & # 8217 ; s life is centred on Lennie. We can, nevertheless, learn a great trade about him through his actions ; he is caring, degree headed and reasonable, but is greatly worn by the changeless attending Lennie requires. Despite this, it is clear that he loves him greatly.

We understand from his actions and attitudes that George is reasonable and able to believe rapidly in a state of affairs, he is rational and a realist. He knows from experience and apprehension of the nature of others, for illustration, that if the foreman hears Lennie talk and realises his disability, so it is improbable they will acquire work. Therefore he tells Lennie non to speak during their preliminary brush, & # 8220 ; you ain & # 8217 ; t gon na state a word? if he finds out what a brainsick asshole you are we won & # 8217 ; t acquire no occupation & # 8221 ; . He besides knows, from past experience presumptively, to do Lennie reiterate things two or three times over to himself, to assist him retrieve. He besides knows that Lennie is likely to make things and effort to conceal them, such as when he immediately realises Lennie has a puppy with him when come ining the bunkhouse. & # 8220 ; George went rapidly to him, grabbed him by the shoulder and rolled him over. He reached down and picked the bantam puppy from where Lennie had been hiding it against his stomach. & # 8221 ; The fact he is so fast and certain in his actions suggests there his small uncertainty in his anticipation that Lennie will hold a puppy with him ; he knows him good. He besides knows to be of course leery of others he encounters for fright that they will be prejudiced against Lennie, and although this can ensue in the loss of possible friendly relationships, it is unluckily necessary as otherwise Lennie would confront much more danger. Exemplification of this is his natural reaction to Curley & # 8217 ; s married woman ; he warns Lennie to remain off from the & # 8220 ; jail-bait all set on the trigger. & # 8221 ; We besides see his necessary inability to swear anyone here, as he talks of his penchant of prostitute over existent relationships ; there is less danger from true engagement. & # 8220 ; You give me a good prostitute house every time. & # 8221 ;

Much of George & # 8217 ; s character concerns his relationship and interaction with Lennie, possibly because he is so invariably occupied with Lennie that the relationship has begun to underpin his full character. He cares for Lennie, guaranting his safety and teaching him in about every state of affairs, an illustration of which is seen in Ch1 when he warns him about imbibing dead H2O, & # 8220 ; You ne’er oughta drink H2O when it ain & # 8217 ; t running, Lennie & # 8221 ; . The fact that this remark is made? hopelessly & # 8217 ; suggests that he has made warnings many times before, which are unheeded by Lennie, a fact which George understands but will go on to teach him anyhow. This state of affairs can, nevertheless, choler George, such as his angry response when Lennie asks where they & # 8217 ; re traveling once more. George, nevertheless, recovers rapidly from this choler ; it may be that he is merely confirming self-denial after losing it briefly, or that his angry visual aspect was merely feigned to expose to Lennie his instead milder defeat.

Without Lennie, George would be much like other work forces, merely rolling the paths of California looking for work. He laments his deficiency of this simple life when he becomes annoyed with Lennie. An illustration of this is seen when a pestered George responds aggressively to Lennie & # 8217 ; s changeless petition for catsup. & # 8220 ; If I was entirely I could populate so easy? no problem? no muss at all. & # 8221 ; He talks of being able to blow his wage each month as other work forces do, basking himself in a pool saloon or cat house before returning to work. The deduction is that George dislikes intensely his duties towards Lennie, and wishes he had a life like other work forces, such as Carlson. The sarcasm is that this is far from the instance, and George is merely showing his defeats with certain facets of his state of affairs, and non with his full life. The common recount of the phrase & # 8220 ; But we ain & # 8217 ; t like that? I got you and you got me & # 8221 ; , in assorted substitutions, at first seems, to the reader, to be incorrect. It appears that their relationship is really nonreversible, George giving all to Lennie ( a suggestion confirmed in more actual footings by Lennie & # 8217 ; s hallucination of Aunt Clara subsequently on, & # 8220 ; when he had a pie he ever gave you half, or more than half & # 8221 ; ) . But it becomes clear that this is non the instance, as it is Lennie who keeps George out

of the prostitute houses and pool bars, which leaves him better off, and so Lennie gives George hope, a vitally of import feature. The importance of Lennie to George is subsequently highlighted by Crooks in his treatment with George ; Lennie merely provides George with person to speak to, to halt him traveling mad, even if he doesn’t understand what is said.

One of the factors that helps George to stay focussed and discourages him from taking up the life of other workers is his dream of having his ain farm. This dream is on a regular basis recounted to Lennie in a manner which suggests he has done it many times before, & # 8220 ; he repeated his words rhythmically & # 8221 ; . It is seen that the narrative of the dream composure Lennie, raising the deduction that George uses it as one of the limited methods he has of commanding Lennie. Later on in the novel, nevertheless, it becomes evident that the dream is every bit much a usher and hope-giver to George as it is to Lennie, as he becomes truly excited about the chance when he realises that it could be a existent possibility, & # 8220 ; Jesus Christ, I bet we could swing her! & # 8221 ; However, after Curley & # 8217 ; s married woman & # 8217 ; s decease, George admits to Sugarcoat that possibly he knew it was ne’er possible, & # 8220 ; I think I knowed we & # 8217 ; d ne’er do her & # 8221 ; . Despite this, and even if George truly did ne’er believe the dream, his incredulity was, for a piece, quashed to the dorsum of his head and the hope supplied by the dream took root, and kept him traveling. More support for the thought that it is truly George & # 8217 ; s dream excessively is that it includes articles from his childhood, such as pigeons circling & # 8220 ; like they done when I was a child & # 8221 ; , a strong index of his personal engagement in the dream.

Through his abstinence from fall ining in with other work forces & # 8217 ; s activities, George is cutting himself out of what small opportunity he has to socialize with others like him, and non merely speak to Lennie. His only nature is characterised by his wont of playing solitaire, a single-player game, because he knows that Lennie would non be able to get by with playing any sort of remotely complex card game. & # 8220 ; Almost automatically George shuffled the cards and laid out his solitaire hand. & # 8221 ; The fact that he does non try to socialize is of import, as whenever he does it consequences in problem. He tells Slim that when he was younger he encouraged Lennie to make stupid things in forepart of others to derive their regard, which endangers Lennie & # 8217 ; s life. This is of import, nevertheless, as it makes George realise that he has a place of power over Lennie that he must utilize with duty, taging a turning point in their relationship. And, when Lennie kills Curley & # 8217 ; s married woman, George is out with the other work forces playing quoitss, trying to socialize. It is non that he does non merit a interruption, but he is in a really hard place in go forthing Lennie entirely. This incident besides consequences in another turning point in their relationship ; George knows that to be humane he must stop Lennie & # 8217 ; s life. It is unfortunate that he can non blend with others, but it is why his dream is so of import to him ; it provides the substance and enjoyment that other work forces find in the whorehouse.

After the decease of Curley & # 8217 ; s married woman, George knows immediately what will go of Lennie and wants to guarantee the most humanist signifier of penalty, a speedy decease. Immediately, George understands that he can non carry through the dream without Lennie, because even though he was non critical practically, Lennie was the driving force that made George strive towards the dream. He does non wish to be associated with Curley & # 8217 ; s married woman & # 8217 ; s decease, non because he fears penalty but because he wants to be able to assist Lennie. He even misleads the other work forces, & # 8220 ; we came from the South so he & # 8217 ; ll travel North & # 8221 ; , because he knows he will return to the coppice, in the South, as instructed. In killing Lennie, his is guaranting his hereafter felicity as he had ever been committed to making in life. It is unfortunate, nevertheless, that at the very terminal of the novel, George agrees to a drink with Slim, possibly taging the beginning of descent into adrift being that Lennie had ever guarded George from.

George is basically merely another spread worker, but he has been protected from the spread worker life by Lennie, while in return he protects Lennie from existent dangers which assail him. He is basically dependent on Lennie because of this, without him George would hold no existent character. He has learnt to be careful and lovingness, and knows that many people will hold biass against Lennie automatically. This is non to state that he is non without bias himself, his clear racism is seen but his arrant refusal to include Crooks in the dream, and so still the biass are nonsubjective, despite his ain common experiences of such bias. One can merely trust that after Lennie & # 8217 ; s decease he would non travel on to go a soul-less Carlson like figure, but it is unluckily likely to be the instance.