Mr. Blaine was under probe for intuition of stealing high-end electronics and computing machine equipment from his occupation ; his foreman contacted the constabulary to carry on an probe on Mr. Blaine to happen out if he had stolen the electronics and computing machine equipment. Police offers come to the concern conducted the probe and collected grounds to construct their instance against Mr. Blaine. after deriving adequate grounds to obtain a hunt warrant from the justice the constabulary arrived at Mr. Blaine house to carry on a hunt of his house and found the electronics and computing machine equipment.

Mr. Blaine was arrested the procedure was conducted by the constabulary. he didn’t attempt to defy apprehension and he asked what he was being arrested for he was told for the larceny of high terminal electronics and computing machine equipment from his occupation he stated he was guiltless and it the high terminal electronics and computing machine equipment belonged to him non to his occupation. Police officers let him he know he can explicate the state of affairs one time is down at the constabulary station and read his Miranda rights with his attorney nowadays.

Mr. Blaine was taking down to the station and his engagement procedure started his images were taken. fingerprints were made. all his personal information was taken such as his reference. day of the month of birth. weight. oculus colour. hair colour. if his has tattoos and where. race. tallness. Detailss of the charges his is charged with is recorded and an administrative recorded of the apprehension is created. Now Mr. Blaine is advised of his rights and is asked to subscribe a signifier that has each right written on it. The signifier besides has a statement admiting the deliberation of rights and certifying the fact that Mr. Blaine understands them.

Mr. Blaine attends his arraignment two yearss subsequently. The justice reads Mr. Blaine all the information his is being charged with. Mr. Blaine is given a transcript of the charges that is brought up against him so once more notified about his rights and asked to come in a supplication of guilty. non guilty or no competition. Which may ensue in strong belief but it can non be used against him subsequently on in a civil tribunal proceeding. Mr. Blaine will besides happen out if he is eligible for bond or non.

Mr. Blaine preliminary hearing was conducted. the justice has to find if there is likely cause to believe that a offense has been committed and that Mr. Blaine committed it. the prosecuting officer has an chance to prove the strength of the grounds at his or her disposal. This hearing besides ever the defence advocate to measure the strength of the prosecution instance. The defence besides finds out what grounds will be presented against their client and if they will come in a supplication deal.

For Mr. Blaine trail the jury has to be picked once the jury is picked they have to be sworn in one time they are sworn they will hold a tribunal day of the month set for the trail to get down. The day of the month of trail will get down with informant being called to take the base for testimony if there are any they will be questioned by both the prosecuting officer and the defence advocate. The prosecuting officer and defence advocate will show their grounds to the tribunal and the jury to set up the guilty and artlessness for their instance.

The Jury for the Mr. Blaine trail will consider on if he is guiltless or guilty by traveling over all the testimony and grounds presented by the prosecuting officer and defence advocate each jury will vote either guilty or non guilty but it has to be an all or nil finding of fact. If the jury needs to extension on their clip to come up with a finding of fact they ask the justice for an extension. If the jury can’t come up with an understanding they will hold to give a ground why there was a hung jury and they could non come up with a finding of fact for the instance to be closed.

The Verdict for Mr. Blaine is made once the jury has come to an understanding on their determination for the instance. but in some instances the finding of fact does non hold to be consentaneous for the inmate to be found guilty or non guilty but if the jury has to be consentaneous and can non come up with a determination it will be the justice may surmise that some jurymans are badly founded. Once the finding of fact is decide the jury will return to the courtroom and give it to tribunal clerk.

The Sentencing for Mr. Blaine will be read by the justice one time the finding of fact is read by the tribunal clerk and the inmate is found guilty of the offense he or she committed. the earnestness of the offense will find the sum of clip Mr. Blaine will be sentenced to function in gaol and if he will hold the possibility of word after functioning a certain sum of clip in prison and non acquiring in problem while in prison.