In “Lord of the Flies” the writer. William Golding. proves his theory on the beginning of immorality in many ways. a chief one being the alterations in the character Jack. William Golding’s theory provinces that civilisation prevents corruptness. Human nature is evil but with the conformance of moral values. supervising. and effects good behaviour can be developed. In his book England is involved in a atomic war and must evacuate the people. A group of private school male childs who are presumptively evacuees are dropped from a plane merely before it crashes onto an uninhibited tropical island.

The male childs are called together by Ralph. who with Piggy had found a conch shell. As the other boys gather onto the platform another party of the male childs. the choir. marches up. They are described as “something dark” or a “creature” . one of the first marks of immorality. All of the male childs decide to elect a leader and the campaigners turn out to be Ralph and Jack. caput of the choir. When the male childs choose Ralph. Jack becomes angered and Ralph offers that the choir be the huntsmans. Jack is so seen as the caput huntsman and a primary destructive force.

Ralph. Jack. and another male child. Simon. caput out to study the land and assure that it is so an island. The male childs have their first confrontation with a hog. Jack is unable to immerse his knife into life flesh and bear the sight of fluxing blood because of the “taboo of the old life” . He is ashamed and vows following clip he will kill it as he drives his knife into a tree bole. This is one of the first major marks of trouble…of the evil in front.

Jack is subsequently described as an animate being. typifying the loss of civilisation. His passage into evil Begins as the influence of his former life and the conditioning wears off. The huntsmans go out to run once more and proudly return with meat. Jack comments with pride about how they cut the pig’s pharynx though he twitches as he speaks of this accomplishment. Jack has non yet reached the point of barbarian forsaking. “His head was crowded with memories ; memories of the cognition that had come to them when they closed in on the fighting hog. cognition that they had outwitted a living thing. imposed their will upon it. taken away its life like a long satisfying drink. ” Another mark of the conditioning erosion off is when Jack hits another male child. Piggy. interrupting his eyeglasses. because Piggy stood up for himself and his beliefs.

On another Hunt. Ralph joins the huntsmans. This Hunt is unsuccessful because the Sus scrofa gets off but Ralph is proud that he hit the hog in the neb with a lance. After this failure the male childs start a reenactment with Robert. a smaller male child. moving as the hog. They begin the chant “Kill the hog! Cut his pharynx! Kill the hog! Bash him in! ” and an overpowering dark desire possesses the male childs. This is the concluding phase before Jack’s passage into complete immorality.

When Jack is angered that the male childs do non desire him as leader he travels to the other portion of the beach and organize his ain folk. He informs the folk that they are traveling to bury about a alleged animal and Hunt. This Hunt is an electrifying success. The male childs hunted a incapacitated sow and as “the afternoon wore on. hazy and awful with moist heat ; the sow staggered her manner in front of them. hemorrhage and mad. and the huntsmans followed. wedded to her in lecherousness. excited by the long pursuit and the dropped blood. ” When they kill the hog there is no vellication of scruples as Jack has to the full transitioned into an evil male child.

While the male childs are banqueting on this hog and observing their triumph Simon is seeking for the alleged animal. He runs into the pig’s caput on a stick. an offering for the animal. The caput transforms into the Lord of the Flies ( actual interlingual rendition for Beelzebub. the head of the Satans ) and Simon has an fanciful conversation with it. The Lord of the Flies explains that it is portion of Simon. portion of the male childs. portion of all work forces. He is the ground “things are what they are” . He is the diabolic kernel that is taking over Jack and the other male childs in their evilness. Simon discovers that the animal is harmless and he goes running to the male childs to portion the good intelligence. The male childs are get downing their dance when Simon runs into the center of the circle and is killed. Simon becomes the enduring victim of the male childs and of Jack’s lunacy.

The concluding and climactic abomination is the Hunt for Ralph. Jack does non wish Ralph because Ralph does non wish Jack so Jack convinces the other male childs that Ralph is the “beast” in camouflage. Jack had antecedently explained to the male childs that Simon was non truly Simon. but the animal in camouflage and he had non truly been killed. At this point Jack is wholly evil. as there is no civilisation.

In “Lord of the Flies” Jack’s alterations into evil prove Golding’s theory about the beginning of immorality. As civilisation is destroyed. Jack becomes more and more immoralities. At the beginning of the book one can see such marks of problem as his reaction the failure to kill the hog. Into the in-between the conditioning have oning off is instead evident. as he becomes prone to killing. Finally. by the terminal Jack is wholly evil. It is the terminal of artlessness and the darkness of man’s bosom.