, Research Paper
After the category argument, Tougher Gun Control on November 12, 1999: I gained a new apprehension of the opposing sides positions on the issue. They had some really strong statements, including some really weak points. I & # 8217 ; ll get down with the stronger points and diminish to the weaker statements throughout this paper.
I do believe that if gun control Torahs get even tougher ( to the point of imprisonment ) than they are at this present clip in society, our gaols, prisons and correctional installations will shortly be overcrowded and we will hold a sentencing job with any issue that arises in the province that assigns the regulations on gun control. There are excessively many struggles and hamlets that develop when a base against one issue will do arguments in another topic, such as sentencing of & # 8220 ; gun maltreaters & # 8221 ; and the overcrowding of prisons.
The opposing side besides mentioned how the & # 8220 ; black market & # 8221 ; ( a name for an belowground organisation that is stolen, bought and sold, ware ) would merely do pieces so much more expensive because they are now all illegal to citizens. Well, I don & # 8217 ; t think that if their were to be tougher gun control Torahs, all of the pieces in the United States of America would be banned, tougher gun control is merely the monitoring of guns, doing certain they are non as easy to acquire in the shops every bit good as on the street. I believe the opposing side was believing in footings of NO GUNS IN THE COUNTRY & # 8230 ; EVER! And that & # 8217 ; s non at all what this issue is approximately.
The other sides weakest statement, in my sentiment was how they are now doing guns with detectors that will merely fire with the proprietors fingerprints. Even though this may be a discovery in engineering for some, there will ever be others to interrupt the system. What makes the mean citizen feel that the suspect can non acquire reproduction of a fingerprint with all of the engineering their is in this universe? No affair what new devices are developed in today & # 8217 ; s clip, their is ever person seeking to interrupt the system.
Did you successfully expect your oppositions statements?
I feel that our oppositions had some really strong positions, they had a good prepared address and statement. In some instances I could expect what they were approximately to convey up and discourse, and so at times I had to believe of a opposi
ng point to reason what they were turn outing.
What feedback from the category did you happen most helpful?
Some of the best remarks came from the category, they had a batch of diverse sentiments and they jumped right in on the subject every bit shortly as the existent arguers clip was up. I feel the most utile information was when one of the schoolmates talked about the whole ground for regulations and Torahs was because of money. This is true, in my sentiment. Another was when a schoolmate talked about the gun in the house used for protection. The whole household was cognizant their was a gun but the kids were taught about the dangers of guns and arms.
Why do you believe your side was non favored by the category?
I feel the category favored the opposing sides sentiment on gun control because in all world, doing gun command Torahs tougher is non traveling to cut down offenses and homicides. I feel that by doing gun control Torahs more rigorous, society as a whole is traveling to desire to arise of course and seek to travel against the authorities and the Torahs. Our side was non favored by the category because in my sentiment, when you make something illegal, rising prices takes topographic point, hence doing the monetary value of guns hideous and doing a mild instance of pandemonium. By penalizing the guilty who use their guns negatively, we can decrease the job of offense and homicides a batch more efficaciously than seeking to cover with the consequences of censoring all guns and so holding to train the multitudes of citizens who are set on their ways of having a gun. For case, taking racism, back in the 1800 & # 8217 ; s it was considered & # 8220 ; normal & # 8221 ; to detest inkinesss ( In the 1900 & # 8217 ; s, it is & # 8220 ; normal to have a piece if you wish ) , Now in 1999, racism has diminished, going more diverse and united at the same clip, but their are still people today that are set on their ways of being racialist. You can & # 8217 ; t alter person & # 8217 ; s mindset if they feel a certain manner. Comparing this theory with gun control, if you ban all guns in the twelvemonth 2050, for case, their are still traveling to be people set in their ways and you won & # 8217 ; t be able to alter their positions.
Even though gun control is a really sensitive issue, I feel personally that their is no concrete reply to the state of affairs and this subject will ne’er rest. Their is to much contention and personal sentiments to cover with such an issue.
