The image of 100s people leaping to their deceases out of Windowss 1. 000 pess of the land. to the multitudes of people chaotically running through the streets will ne’er be forgotten to the people affected by terrorist onslaughts on September 11. 2001. Ever since that ruinous twenty-four hours in history. the push for safer national security steps has been important in doing certain an onslaught ne’er occurs once more ; one of these steps being racial profiling. Racial profiling is the usage of race or ethnicity as land for surmising person of holding committed an discourtesy. Law enforcement governments use racial profiling to find which persons they need to halt and inquiry. It is indispensable in order to procure the safety of people. The usage of racial profiling in jurisprudence enforcement is to guarantee national security. Racial profiling is used as a tool in constabulary work to assist place suspects. Some claim that the usage of racial profiling in jurisprudence enforcement is unconstitutional because it violates citizen’s rights. Racial profiling in jurisprudence enforcement is indispensable to safely procure the citizens of the United States.

Protecting national security and guaranting public safety are two of the benefits of racial profiling. The United States Department of Justice requires that “…federal jurisprudence enforcement forces must utilize every legitimate tool to forestall future onslaughts. protect our Nation’s boundary lines. and deter those who would do lay waste toing injury to our state and its people…” ( “Should Racial” ) . One of these tools in constabulary work includes racial profiling. which helps to protect and forestall offense in our state. It is logical to hold that “If an officer sees person moving in a mode that suggests a offense is afoot ; he or she has an duty to halt and inquiry that person” ( Bloomberg ) . Preventing offense is a constabulary officer’s occupation. which is why the state uses this scheme. They are here to maintain the nation’s citizens safe. “Without the usage of profiling and FBI sources. they would hold ne’er succeeded” ( “Should Racial” ) in their onslaught on the United States. Racial profiling by jurisprudence enforcement is purely for the benefit of society so that they can efficaciously protect and supply security. The nation’s citizens need to understand that without steps like racial profiling. people are non traveling to be safe.

When jurisprudence enforcement officers have to place suspects. they are to utilize every tool possible. one of these tools being racial profiling. Often times “…police officers rely on information that may be coinciding to clamber colour. but non dependent on it” ( “Should Racial” ) . It is these officers’ occupation to look for suspects who happen to hold a certain characteristic to place by. Therefore. utilizing racial profiling in this facet is helpful and most decidedly constitutional. When an officer is looking for a suspect. “…adding his cognition of the race of major trafficking groups to the mix is both legitimate and non excessively burdensome on observant minorities” ( “Should Racial” ) .

By holding an apprehension of an cultural group’s background. constabulary officers can more efficaciously identify suspects. cut downing the likeliness that suspects wouldn’t be charged with a offense. It is necessary that “If jurisprudence enforcement officers are to place and take action against lawbreakers. any information to help them in being more effectual is crucial” ( “History and” ) . Racial profiling can be the key for officers to efficaciously place lawbreakers. The usage of racial profiling in jurisprudence enforcement makes society safer because it makes it easier for officers to place a suspect with their race as a feature.

Some people may reason that racial profiling goes against the Constitution and country’s ethical motives. The American Civil Liberties Union argues that “…racial profiling is in every case inconsistent with this country’s core constitutional rules of equality and fairness” ( “Should Racial” ) . If the American Civil Liberties Union wants everyone to be equal and treated with equity. so that means protecting everyone every bit and reasonably. While this may be true in some peoples sentiment. “…the president has emphasized that…Federal jurisprudence enforcement officers who are protecting national security or forestalling ruinous events…may consider race. ethnicity. and other relevant factors to the extent permitted by our Torahs and the Constitution” ( “Should Racial” ) . Therefore. the usage of racial profiling as a tool to protect and forestall in jurisprudence enforcement is wholly legal.

The Preamble of the Constitution provinces “We the people of the United States. in order to organize a more perfect brotherhood. set up justness. insure domestic repose. supply for the common defence. advance the general public assistance and procure the approvals of autonomy to ourselves and our prosperity…” ( “Preamble” ) . Those who oppose racial profiling are perfectly wrong when they say that it is against constitutional beliefs. Right here. in the Preamble of the United States. it talks about organizing a perfect brotherhood and guaranting and supplying the safety of it.

These powerful words prove that racial profiling demands to be used in order to organize a more perfect brotherhood. it needs to be used to set up justness. it needs to be used to see domestic repose. it needs to be used to supply for the common defence. and most decidedly. it needs to be used to advance the general public assistance. These grounds eliminate the questionability of the moralss behind racial profiling ; turn outing that it is indispensable to the safety of others and it needs to be accepted as a dependable tool in jurisprudence enforcement.

The usage of racial profiling in jurisprudence enforcement is the key to safety within the United States. It proves to be improbably helpful when holding to place a suspect and doing society safe. If the safety of every citizen was non ensured and constabularies did non utilize every tool they could to capture suspects. would you experience safe?

Plants Cited
Bloomberg. Michael. “Michael Bloomberg: ‘Stop and Frisk’ Keeps New York Safe. ” Washington Post. The Washington Post. 18 Aug. 2013. Web. 23 Feb. 2015. “History and Debate of Racial Profiling. ” Racial Profiling Debate. N. p. . n. d. Web. 27 Feb. 2015. “Preamble. ” National Constitution Center – Constitutioncenter. org. N. p. . n. d. Web. 27 Feb. 2015. “Should Racial Profiling Be Accepted as a Law Enforcement Practice? – ACLU – ProCon. org. ” ProConorg Headlines. N. p. . n. d. Web. 23 Feb. 2015.