The Stranger And Absurdness Essay, Research Paper
The Stranger is an geographic expedition of Camus & # 8217 ; s doctrine of the absurd, non a morality narrative incorporating a & # 8220 ; lesson & # 8221 ; for the reader & # 8217 ; s moral wellbeing. Camus & # 8217 ; s doctrine of the absurd characterizes the universe and human being as holding no rational intent or significance. Despite the absence of a rational intent or significance, human existences demand that there be one. He suggests that human existences are thrust into life that can merely stop in decease. Meursault & # 8217 ; s personality embodies this doctrine. In maintaining with this doctrine, Meursault & # 8217 ; s simple, direct coverage of his female parent & # 8217 ; s decease and her funeral offers no coherent reading that ties his life together in any meaningful manner. He enters the narrative without a yesteryear, and Camus does non utilize the technique of boding to suggest at the future events of the novel. Meursault & # 8217 ; s dialogue topographic points him steadfastly in the present. He reports his feelings as they happen, wondering at the beauty of the twenty-four hours on the forenoon of his female parent & # 8217 ; s funeral.
The indispensable enticement for the reader in The Stranger is to delegate cause and consequence accounts that mitigate or condemn the overpowering grounds of Meursault & # 8217 ; s indifference. He expresses no heartache in response to his female parent & # 8217 ; s decease. Rather, he attends a comedy and slumbers with a new girlfriend the twenty-four hours after her funeral. He expresses no disapprobation of Raymond & # 8217 ; s physical maltreatment of his kept woman and even agrees to take part in Raymond & # 8217 ; s barbarous strategy to penalize her for the unfaithfulness of which he suspects her. Meursault writes the missive for Raymond non because he is
mean, but because it makes no difference to him one manner or another. He experiences neither repugnance nor pleasance. Neither does Meursault show any disapprobation of Salamano’s mistreatment of his Canis familiaris.
When Meursault is arrested for slaying the brother of Raymond & # 8217 ; s kept woman in the 2nd half of the novel, the tribunal imposes a rational order on the events Meursault studies objectively in the first half. Meursault reports that he drinks java and smokes a coffin nail next to his female parent & # 8217 ; s casket, but he assigns no significance, moral or otherwise, to his actions. It is the same with the timing of his relationship with Marie. However, during his test, the tribunal reads his actions as back uping grounds that Meursault is an insensitive monster.
Meursault does non dig into psychological soul-searching, and he similarly does non judge or construe the actions of others. Therefore, it is possible to asseverate that Meursault has non yet developed a full consciousness. He is non really self-conscious, and he is non really cognizant of the workings that take topographic point in the heads of others. He functions largely as an perceiver of the universe around him even as he participates in it. After his female parent & # 8217 ; s decease, he perceives no great alteration in life and therefore assigns no significance to her loss. Meursault would hold to take interpretative control over his life to delegate significance to her decease. Many people may take merely such control over construing intending in their ain lives, but Camus suggests that this is caused by a demand for rational construction. Meursault is Camus & # 8217 ; s illustration of person who doesn & # 8217 ; t need this rational universe position.
