Uncle Dan Essay, Research Paper
The uneven superstitious notions touched upon were all prevalent among kids and slaves
in the West at the period of this narrative & # 8212 ; that is to state, 30 or 40
old ages ago. Mark Twain Hartford, 1876 Covering with the function of thaumaturgy in HF,
Daniel Hoffman claims “ a elusive emotional composite binds together
superstitious notion: slaves: boyhood freedom in Mark Twain & # 8217 ; s mind. “ 1We know how
Twain felt about boyhood freedom & # 8211 ; his nostalgia for it lead him to some of his
finest authorship, and it lends its appeal to his most abiding plants, The
Adventures of Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. How Twain felt
toward slaves is more equivocal. In his autobiography Twain wrote of “ Uncle
Dan & # 8217 ; cubic decimeter ” , the adult male on whom the character Jim was based, that his
“ understandings were broad and warm ” and that his “ bosom was honest
and simple and knew no craft ” ( Autob. , 2. ) To the clip spent on his uncle & # 8217 ; s
farm in Florida, Missouri Twain credited his “ strong liking for his [ Uncle
Dan’l ‘s ] race and & # 8230 ; grasp of certain of its all right qualities ” ( Autob. ,
3. ) To the late-twentieth-century reader, of class, Twain & # 8217 ; s intervention of inkinesss
is highly debatable. Jim & # 8217 ; s character nowadayss many troubles & # 8212 ; are we
to believe of Jim as the adult male who longs for his household even as he valorously runs
off from them or the sap who additions famous person among the slaves for a narrative he
invents and believes? How could Twain let Jim to asseverate his human self-respect on
the raft, so capable him to a series of gross humiliations at the Phelps farm?
Definitive replies to these inquiries are impossible. However they and the fact
that they must stay unsolved affect all decisions we draw about Twain and
his black characters. In sing superstitious notion, the 3rd portion of this
triangular relationship, we are once more left with inquiries about Twain & # 8217 ; s
feelings. In Form and Fable in American Fiction, Daniel Hoffman writes that
“ Twain & # 8217 ; s usual premise is that white individuals of
any position higher than
rubbish like Pap have small cognition of, and no belief in, superstitious notion ” 2
Superstition is chiefly for slaves and male childs. It is of import to observe that within
the model of Huck Finn, disassociating a thing from white civilization is by no
agencies projecting it in hapless visible radiation. In fact when put under the examination of Huck & # 8217 ; s
honest narrative, white civilization suffers severely. Miss Watson, though
“ good ” , is rough and unkind. The King and Duke think nil of
flim-flaming the Wilks girls out of their heritage ; even the Grangerfords, who
are “ quality ” , partake in a barbarous and deathly feud. The ferociousnesss
that Huck witnesses & # 8211 ; Buck & # 8217 ; s killing, Boggs & # 8217 ; slaying & # 8211 ; are committed by Whites.
Although Pap has superstitious notions, common people beliefs in the narrative belong to Huck and
Jim, the characters we most trust. While incidents like Jim imploring clemency from
the “ shade ” Huck and Nat and the enchantress pie are clearly intended to
do the reader laugh at the ignorance of the trusters, are we non someway left
in the terminal with the thought that the avid followings of superstitious notion are someway
safer than their Christian opposite numbers? In The Adventures of Tom Sawyer “ a
male child of German parenthood ” memorizes eight or ten thousand bible poetries but
goes mad from the attempt. In Huck Finn the Shepherdsons and Grangerfords go to
church with their guns. On the other side, the slaves “ come from all
about ” to see the five cent piece which they and Jim believe was given to
him by the Satan. We as readers know that the slaves have been duped by their
ain superstitious notion and by Tom & # 8217 ; s mischievousness, but are we convinced that they are worse
away than the people at the cantonment meeting who donate a sum of $ 87.75 to that
villain, the King, for his mission in the Indian Ocean?
1. Daniel G. Hoffman, “ Jim & # 8217 ; s Magic: Black or White? ” . American
Literature XXXII March 1960, pp. 47-54. back to text 2. Daniel G. Hoffman, Form
and Fable in American Fiction. Oxford University Press. New York, 1965.