W.E.B Du Bois and Booker T Washington Essay

Free Articles

During the early twentieth century. black Americans were by and large at the bottom round of development. A bantam per centum of educated inkinesss were of class there but the future chances for inkinesss were still black. In their desire to advance advancement of black Americans. two black leaders of the period played a important function in the black motion of the clip ; William Edward Burghardt Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. In measuring the doctrines of these intellectuals and black motion leaders. we must appreciate the fortunes both of these leaders were runing in.

Booker T Washington was faced with life and operating in the southern United States which had still non come to term with the equality of races. Washington realized that in order to better the batch of his black countrymen he would necessitate the support of white bulk He knew that he would hold to still their frights sing all claims of equality to seek their aid to supply instruction and support for the black causes. W. E. B. du Bois was settled in the much relaxed and broad North. Du Bois wanted to see an America with societal equality where persons would be rewarded harmonizing to their virtues.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Washington and du Bois both wanted development of black Americans but their positions were radically different. each had a different vision of how the black Americans and white American would coexist. Washington’s historical address known as ‘The Atlanta Compromise’ [ Tell. 1996 ] possibly best depict his compromising attack. he thought was required to seek conservative white support for his development programs for black Americans. “The wisest among my race. understand that the agitation of inquiries of societal equality is the radical folly.

Advancement for inkinesss comes from a steady occupation. a bank history. a piece of belongings. non from protest and vote thrusts. Blacks will till Fieldss. draw cargo. and cook repasts. a trustworthy labour force with no societal aspirations and few political sentiments. Having proved their value as employees and consumers. they may fall in U. S. society as peers. [ Washington. 1901 ] ” Booker T. Washington possibly knew that his Southerner Whites would be pleased to hear that and they did. . Clark Howell. a taking white voice in the South. called it “a platform upon which inkinesss and Whites can stand with full justness. [ Bauerlein. 2004 ] ” .

Even President Cleveland said “Your words can non neglect to please and promote all who wish good for your race [ Bauerlein. 2004 ] ” . ” Washington was practical. On the other manus Du Bois attack is rather different. In order to advance his gifted 10th strategy Du Bois declares “Whether you like it or non the 1000000s ( inkinesss ) are here. and here they will stay. If you do non raise them up. they will draw you down. Education and work are the levers to elate a people. Work entirely will non make it unless inspired by the right ideals and guided by intelligence. Education must non merely learn work – it must learn Life.

The Talented Tenth of the Negro race must be made leaders of idea and missionaries of civilization among their people. No others can make this work and Negro colleges must develop work forces for it. The Negro race. like all other races. is traveling to be saved by its exceeding work forces. “Du Bois stood for race pride and higher instruction. Washington for tactical conciliation and vocational instruction. Washington appeared to be truly impressed with the high quality of white. He was matter-of-fact and believed that black Americans would be unable to alter the anti-black sentiments through protests [ Moseley-Braun. 1995 ] .

His soft attack won him many friends among the Whites and his vocational instruction plan and his Tuskegee College had 1000000s of dollars of gifts and investing in belongings. Washington’s policies of supplying vocational preparation helped many inkinesss but it displeased many black leaders. Du Bois cooperated with Washington on many rational black issues but he was a terrible critic of B. T. Washington’s vocational preparation merely for blacks’ policy. Du Bois believed that inkinesss should be trained in vocational preparation every bit good as broad humanistic disciplines and the humanistic disciplines.

Du Bois and many other black leaders believed that Washington’s credence of black subjugation was a resignation of human self-respect. Du Bois was a superb bookman. author. and societal scientist. while Washington had no such claim. Unlike Washington ; Du Bois was non an Anglophile. Dubois Hagiographas on black issues protesting the status and intervention of black Americans gave a voice to black American idea. Both Du Bois and Washington agreed on the demand to construct black establishments. Washington thought that over clip black would incorporate into the society taking the demand to hold black establishments. while Du Bois was non optimistic.

Du Bois warned Whites of Black American’s restlessness and radical ideas if their societal place did non better [ Asch. 1999 ] . When Washington complained of inequality he presented its consequence non upon the black Americans but upon Whites. If white Southerners saw no ground for higher instruction for black Americans. Washington agreed. If Southerners opposed voting for inkinesss. Washington went along and opposed it ‘for present’ . His positions would surely be considered ’pathetic’ by today’s black Americans. Even in his ain clip. black militant Henry Turner declared “will hold to populate a long clip to undo the injury he has done our race.

” When Washington declared his “Atlanta Promise. on black paper derided Washington by stating. “Prof. B. T. or Bad Taste Washington has made a speech… . The white imperativeness manner Prof. Bad Taste the new Negro. but if there is anything in him except the most servile type of the old Negro we fail to happen it. ” Economic Policies of Dubois and Washington Washington was matter-of-fact in his attack. He recognized that he would hold to seek majority’s support in his attempt to win economic upheaval of his people. His attack was that inkinesss will hold to work hard to turn out their worth.

They must be prepared to work in ordinary laboring occupations and get vocational preparation and trades to go priceless to the industrial economic system developing at that clip. “I think that the whole hereafter of my race flexible joints on the inquiry as to whether or non it can do itself of such indispensable value that the people in the town and the province where we reside will experience that our presence is necessary to the felicity and wellbeing of the community. No adult male who continues to add something to the stuff. rational. and moral wellbeing of the topographic point in which he lives is long left without proper wages.

This is the great human jurisprudence which can non be for good nullified” [ Washington. 1901 ] Washington said all the right things to delight the white bulk. He recognized that black slaves brought from Africa were crude barbarians and the bondage despite its inhuman treatment gave them an chance to “learn the values of work. thrift. belongings. and piety” [ Washington. 1901 ] This sort of submissiveness gave him the support of white bulk and made immense financess available for his vocational schools and other undertakings. The financess available to his Tuskegee organisation ran into 1000000s.

White altruists channeled their contributions through Washington doing him the black power agent of the state. The support he received from altruists like Andrew Carnegie and from State and Federal authorities allowed him to distribute a cyberspace of nines and organisations to function inkinesss and besides increase his ain influence. Washington advocated that the anti-Negro sentiment is the white bulk will non be reversed through protests and the inkinesss will hold to work hard and rectify societal behaviour that they were “ready for the duties of the citizenship” .

There is no uncertainty that Washington’s attack towards inkinesss integrating into the society was appreciated by Whites and a bulk of conservative inkinesss. In the instance of Plessy v. Ferguson. when the Supreme Court declared support for separate-but-equal philosophy. Washington accepted this determination. He was besides non against the southern restricted vote Torahs. For Washington these were non issues ‘at present’ . as most inkinesss could non afford first category railway autos.

In brief Booker T. Washington’s attack was that of working with close cooperation of the white bulk to elate the economic position and academic degree of inkinesss. He believed that this was required for the passage province until inkinesss acquired instruction and cognition of trades through vocational schools to go genuinely indispensable for the white bulk. Washington advocated belongings accretion and ego aid as agencies of truly claiming citizenship rights.

He established National Negro Business League in 1900 and presented the League as a theoretical account of self-made successful man of affairs for the black people [ Mercer & A ; Beckett. 2004 ] . Many black leaders nevertheless disagreed with this attack as they believed that Washington’s attack amounted to give up and credence of racial high quality of white race. Du Bois- A superb bookman and an angry ‘young’ adult male till his decease While Washington proved to be an intelligent and matter-of-fact. Du Bois advocated hawkish protest against the unfairnesss against the African Americans.

While Washington’s attack to race issue can be described as chauvinistic. Dubois believed in equal chance with racial averment and he was an elitist at the same clip as he wanted the gifted ten percent of his race to busy an elevated place where black multitudes will elate the gifted ten percent and ” the multitudes were non the agents on their ain behalf” [ Stein. 1998 ] . Du Bois was a superb bookman. In his early plant he appears to believe in the construct of race [ Moses. 1993 ] . By 1905 he became positive that it was wrong to presume that racial biass were due to ignorance but were a portion of deep rooted beliefs among Whites.

He came to the decisions that ground entirely would non work out the job and propaganda had to be used as a tool to stop the racial biass [ Oslon. 2005 ] By 1940. his theory of ‘race concept’ calls race a societal concept and a merchandise of power and opposition [ Du Bois. 1940 ] . Dubois connected race with category in American capitalist society and called the hierarchy therefore created as an undemocratic power which needed to be resisted. He believed that the political and societal concepts assembled together which he calls ‘world’ non race [ Oslon. 2005 ] .

He became a representative of his race and argued that the political forces of dark universe must fight to stop the power of white universe. He advocated ‘self segregation’ and began to promote the creative activity of a ‘nation within nation’ . He was against segregation but now he began to reason that the segregation push upon the inkinesss can besides take advantage of this segregation by pooling resources and utilize this ‘deliberate and purposeful segregation’ to roll up black capital jointly and non to construct black capitalist economy.

He expected an economic revolution and wanted the inkinesss to be among the leaders for this alteration. He called the creative activity of a “separate state within a nation” as the way to industrial democracy [ Du Bois. 1935 ] . Du Bois was an rational like whom ; the black race had ne’er produced. He was besides an militant who helped raise the scruples of black Americans and after the long bondage and its impact gave Black American person to be proud of. He founded National Association for Advancement of Colored People ( NACCP ) . The Association published. the Crisis with Du Bois as its editor for 24 old ages.

It gave the black authors an chance to read wider audience and besides a platform to Du Bois to distribute his extremist message. In footings of political success Du Bois part to black Americans is problematic but no 1 can doubt that Du Bois ain part helped a great trade in reconstructing black pride in their ain race. In the ulterior old ages Dubois moved progressively to the left and worked on analysing the black labour as a power for Marxism in America. His protagonism of ‘nation within a nation’ to a signifier of black segregation isolated him from the mainstream inkinesss.

He organized Pan African Congress. In ulterior old ages he joined Communist parties and helped many causes across the racial divide. There is no uncertainty that Dubois was a great bookman. possibly the greatest African Americans have of all time produced. His extremist attack helped stop the submissive image of Black Americans but it did non stop the subjugation or 2nd category citizen position of African Americans. The attack followed by Washington was possibly more suitable to the attitude of white America and would hold surely improved the economic position of African Americans.

The proud African American would hold nevertheless non accepted the position Booker Washington was recommending for excessively long. Decisions William Edward Burghardt Du Bois and Booker Washington were great black philosopher of their clip. They both had their ain vision of how black Americans could come on in United States. Washington. being in much more hostile South had to follow a quietly quietly attack. Washington was practical while Du Bois was proud and both contributed to the betterment of inkinesss in America. Bibliography Asch. K. . ( 1999 ) . Still No Shades of Gray. Insight on the News.

Volume: 15. Issue: 12. Bauerlein. M. ( 2004 ) Washington. Du Bois. and the Black Future. The Wilson QuarterlyVolume: 28. Issue: 4. Du Bois. W. E. B. . ( 1935 ) “A Negro Nation Within the Nation” . in Andrew G. Paschal. Ed. . . A W. E. B. Du Bois Reader ( New York: Collier. 1971 ) . 73 Du Bois. W. E. B. . ( 1940 ) Dusk of Dawn: An Essay Toward an Autobiography of a Race Concept ( New Brunswick. New jersey: Transaction. 1995 ) . Lewis. R. . ( 2007 ) . Leading the Negro into Modernity- Turner. Washington. & A ; Du Bois. [ Online ] retrieved from Internet on 24 April 2007. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nathanielturner.

com/leadingthenegrointomodernity. htm Mercer. D. and Beckett. E. . ( 2003 ) . The Rise of Jim Crow and the Nadir. 1878-1915. New Jersey State Library. New Jersey Department of State. [ Online ] retrieved from Internet on 24 April 2007. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. njstatelib. org/NJ_Information/Digital_Collections/AAHCG/unit8. html Moseley-Braun. C. . ( 1995 ) . Between W. E. B. Du Bois and B. T. Washington. Ebony. Volume: 51. Issue: 1. November 1995. Page Number: 58+ Moses. W. J ( 1993 ) . “W. E. B. Du Bois’s ‘The Conservation of Races’ and Its Context: Idealism. Conservatism. and Hero Worship. ” Massachusetts Review 34. no.

2 ( Summer1993 ) : 275-294 ; Oslon. J. . ( 2005 ) . W. E. B. Du Bois and the Race Concept Joel Olson. Northern Arizona University. USA Rudwick. E. M. . ( 1960 ) . W. E. B. Du Bois a Study in Minority Group Leadership. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia Stein. J. . 1998. History of an Idea. the Nation. Volume: 267. Issue: 20 Tell. B. ( 1996 ) . ‘Separate Yet One’- Booker T. Washington’s Atlanta Compromise Displayed at Library. [ Online ] retrieved from Internet on 24 April 2007. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. loc. gov/loc/lcib/9603/booker. html Washington. Booker T. . ( 1901 ) . Up From Slavery. New York

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out