Burrial At The Ornanas Essay, Research Paper

Name of piece: Burial at Ornans

Name of creative person: Gustave Courbet

Date produced: 1849.

I foremost look at Burial at Ornans and take a disfavor to it.

I see a picture of a little group of people with inexorable looks on their faces. The piece is oil on canvas. It s merely painted, possibly a pallet knife has been used, and the colorss are rough and existent, with definite borders and coloring material alterations. Space has been used good, with the bulk of the item across the in-between length of the piece, go forthing the top and bottom lengths instead plain and empty to mean the land and skies. The piece is balanced good the people are all standing on common land and are approximately similar tallness. The creative person has proportioned the people adequately to complement the size of the canvas with plentifulness of room around the to add background item. The piece is of a group of people have oning black and a priest ( they are presumptively at a funeral ) . The looks on their faces are blue as they stand and mourn for person on that glooming twenty-four hours.

The creative person doesn T appear to be conveying a message ; he has merely painted what he has seen. The piece expressed unhappiness and bereavement. The wretchedness of the people and the cloud-covered twenty-four hours work manus in manus together, making a twice as affecting scene as if either one H

ad non existed.

The creative person has used the features of the above two phases good. He every bit painted what he saw and, as I can merely presume this is precisely what he saw, he painted it wonderfully. He has captured the feeling of the people at the funeral and exerts these feelings to their full potency. Courbet merely painted one manner ; he was a realist. He painted what he saw and tried to capture the feeling of the now, and non the later or the earlier. He had a peculiar involvement in painting precisely what he saw, so this piece is surely effectual. The piece was meant to demo the scene at manus. Courbet has done this well. I can see the scene and I can experience the scene. Despite the feeling of the work being a sad one, it was meant to be a sad picture, and so I commend him for holding it done so absolutely.

For what it is, I like it a batch. I like the manner he has taken the feelings of the people and painted them onto a canvas. I dislike the fact that the feeling is a inexorable one, but it was meant to be so, so for that ground I admire it. I like the piece.

Now holding analysed the piece, I like it. My feeling of the piece has changed because at first I didn Ts like it because of the feeling it gave off. Having discussed why it gives that feeling, I can understand the piece better and I realise that it was meant to be so, and appreciate the piece for what it is.