“Little psyches who thirst for battle. these work forces were born to bore and die” ( Crane 7-8 ) . Stephen Crane’s verse form acknowledges the fact that many soldiers in the war have fought for endurance. dehumanized. and lost lives for their state. Many propose the thought that war is non necessary and that it is unpointed. This is rather dry since a great sum of people go to war even though they think that it is unneeded. By and large. these conflicts can be prevented after all most people would state that war is a tragic thing and that it shouldn’t play such a large function in life. Author of an international bestselling novel All Quiet on the Western Front. Erich Maria Remarque besides portrays a similar intent in his novel as Stephen Crane’s verse form “War is Kind” . Remarque and Crane both want to convey a message of harmoniousness by clearly defining the destructiveness. dehumanisation. and the absurdity of war. Remarque presents his fresh demoing readers how the soldiers feel when combating in this war. Tjaden. one of the chief characters in the novel says. “Then what precisely is war for? [ … ] there must be some people to whom the war is utile.

Well I’m non one of them. non you. nor anybody else here” ( Remarque 205 ) . Tjaden makes a clear point that him and his friends do non desire to be here contending this war. non to advert that by him inquiring the inquiry of “what is war for? ” . shows that he doesn’t even cognize why he’s here and has to confront all these devastations. Albert. another chief character in this fresh adds. “We didn’t want the war. the others say the same thing-and yet half the universe is in it all the same” ( Remarque 206 ) . This shows sarcasm because it clearly states that if the others say that they don’t want war. so why be in it and do such a large forfeit? It all contradicts itself and brings one to the point that war is an act of stupidity. Crane presents his poem “War is Kind” in a similar manner as Remarque’s novel to show what the soldiers go through when contending in this war. He writes with the usage of anaphora when saying. “War is kind” throughout his verse form. This exposes the intent that he wishes to convey to his readers of the honest truth. war is truly non sort. and that it is pathetic. Crane says. “Make field to them the excellence of killing and a field where a 1000 corpses lie” ( Crane 21-22 ) .

Such an hyperbole brings readers to the position of a soldier that has been dehumanized into believing that killing is tolerant. Crane creates an visual aspect of imagination when depicting. “Because your male parent tumbles in the xanthous trenches. raged at his chest. gulped and died” ( Crane 13-14 ) . Using such words. he genuinely proposes the fact that war is a ghastly image for those who are in it. connoting that war is nonmeaningful if decease is a common thing. Both Remarque’s usage of imagination and Crane’s usage of paradox attention deficit disorder to the auctorial intent of their plants. Remarque grabs the readers’ attending with a awful scene. “Here hang spots of uniform. and someplace else is plastered a bloody muss that was one time a human limb” ( Remarque 208 ) . Such hideous descriptions of a disgustful scene display a ocular in readers’ heads of how destructive war truly is. Crane’s usage of paradox in his verse form presents a contradiction between war and kindness. “Do non weep. maiden. for war is sort. because your lover threw wild custodies toward the sky and the affrighted steed ran on alone. make non cry war is kind” ( Crane 1-5 ) . Because war is non sort in anyway. the usage of paradox in this verse form reveals the true significance that the thought of war has been made into a god-like thing that can work out jobs when in world war ‘kindly’ teaches us the falseness belief that it can convey glorification to anyone.

Readers can easy place the usage of imagination in Remarque’s novel and sense of paradox in Crane’s verse form. Erich Maria Remarque and Stephen Crane’s works both contain a intent. to explicate to readers the destructiveness of war plus the dehumanisation of soldiers that participate in the conflict and that war is irrelevant to most subscribers to it. Both Remarque and Crane select the usage of imagination. an dry tone. a sense of paradox. and for Crane. the usage of anaphora and exaggeration to convey their overall message. Without a uncertainty. both writers wanted to hold their voices heard and their ideas on war comprehended. Readers. no affair from the late 19th centuries or the twelvemonth 2013 will still grok the destructiveness of war. lost lives. dehumanisation. and the honest truth that no affair the fact that war is meaningless. it still continues on even today.