& # 8217 ; s Waldo Two: Positive Change In World Through Manipulation Of Behavior Essay, Research Paper
B.F Skinner & # 8217 ; s Waldo Two: Positive Change In World Through Manipulation of
Behavior
B.F. Skinner, in his fresh Walden Two, nowadayss many statements about how
he foresees a positive alteration in the universe through use of behaviour on
the personal degree. Sigmund Freud, in his plants, specifically Civilization and
Its Discontentments, presents his position of human nature and what is innately
debatable about it. Both Freud and Skinner agree that human behaviour is the
consequence of outside factors that badly hinder the construct of free will.
Skinner believes that worlds, in the right environment, can populate merrily,
while Freud understands that worlds are destined to populate in & # 8220 ; some grade of
torment or discontent. & # 8221 ;
Skinner uses the ideal scene of Walden Two to exemplify his thoughts of
how human behaviour should be & # 8220 ; formed. & # 8221 ; Much of Skinner & # 8217 ; s statement on how to
extinguish what he knows as debatable remainders on his prescription of disregarding
the impression of single freedom. Skinner does non merely say that the construct
of single freedom is a travesty. He takes it a measure further and provinces that
the hunt for it is where society has gone incorrectly. He wants no portion in the
pursuit for single freedom. If we give up this semblance, says Skinner, we
can condition everyone to move in acceptable ways.
Skinner has a specific prescription for making this Utopian society.
He declares that all that is necessary is to alter the conditions which
environment adult male. & # 8220 ; Give me the specifications, and I & # 8217 ; ll give you the adult male & # 8221 ; is his
simple yet singular message. He claims that by commanding what a individual & # 8217 ; s
environment is, it is possible to craft a adult male to act in any manner. Skinner
wants to utilize this impression to make a universe without hurting and agony. In
Walden Two, he consistently describes what conditions are necessary to make
a universe of felicity.
Skinner proposes that to make his perfect society, one needs merely to
come up with the features of what adult male should be. Since he can so
create any adult male, he will make full the universe with these perfectly-conditioned people
and all will be perfect. Although many of his penetrations are debatable at the
root degree, some of what Skinner proposes is material which should non merely be
wholly dismissed.
Freud has a much different construct of human being. He, excessively, says
that people are & # 8220 ; formed & # 8221 ; out of experiences and preexistent conditions.
How
of all time, Freud believes that the biggest factor in determining human behaviour is
much more personal and internal. Since everyone experiences things otherwise,
he claims, it is impossible to determine everyone so that some Utopian society will
signifier, as in Skinner & # 8217 ; s instance.
Freud recognizes on one degree that there is an unconditioned struggle between
the person and society. So even at the first degree, there is a struggle
which will impede felicity. Freud states that the norms of society are much
excessively strict for the common individual because they are in struggle with the inner
desires of the mind. Keep in head, this has nil to make with each
single & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; roots, & # 8221 ; but it states that, upon come ining the universe, each homo
is doomed to conflict with social criterions.
From twenty-four hours one besides, each single feels force per unit area from every societal
way. His parents influence him by their raising methods and their
demands of him. As he begins to develop, his head does every bit good, and any
negative experience manifests some grade of struggle between the three parts
of the head.
Basically, Freud has such a rough position of world because he believes
there are so many ways in which the head is attacked: societal, parental, self-
inflicted. One might hold no job covering with the force per unit area from society,
yet may, for illustration, experience guilty about one thing or another. Freud would state
that this would make some kind of struggle in the head, one which is
inevitable and through no sum of conditioning is prohibitable.
Besides, since the three parts of the head ( id, self-importance, and superego ) are
invariably rupturing at one another. The self-importance has to equilibrate the desires of the
Idaho with the criterions of the superego while accepting the outside world. If
any job occurs and the balance is thrown away, enduring will ensue. & # 8220 ; So
neuroticism consequences from the defeat of basic inherent aptitudes, either because of
external obstructions or because of internal mental instability & # 8221 ; ( Stevenson 77. )
Both Freud and Skinner find jobs with the current societal state of affairs.
Freud says that, for the most portion, we can non alter the interior mechanisms of
the head, while Skinner says that any type of conditioning is possible. Possibly
through both of these theories, we can larn to organize some kind of declaration.
Concise Bibliography
I. Civilization and Its Discontentments, Sigmund Freud.
II. The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
III. Walden Two, B.F. Skinner.
IV. Seven Theories of Human Nature, Leslie Stevenson.