A few months ago. a adult female was viciously raped. beaten and left for dead. Since the onslaught she remains in a coma. This instance has risen to national prominence as an illustration of how today’s young person no longer respects cardinal societal values. telecasting and picture game force has desensitized immature work forces to the effects of offenses such as assault and colza. and as a presentation of the inability of the constabulary to maintain the streets safe for observant citizens. My spouse and I work in the condemnable justness system as constabulary officers and manage most of the homicide instances in our country. The promotion from this offense has placed our constabulary section under force per unit area to direct person to test for this offense instantly.

A pack of immature work forces were spotted in the countries where the victim was found assaulting and endangering people that were go throughing by. Two members of the pack were arrested. The two members are both male and 14 old ages of age that both have old records of robbery and assault. Our duty as constabulary officers is to follow the policy and ethical criterions of our constabulary section and the jurisprudence. which states. bush leagues must be informed of their legal right to hold their parents present during the question and to utilize videotape during of import interviews.

However. my spouse has pushed his ethical duty aside and question both of the bush leagues while make up one’s minding non to reach their parents or tape the question. When I confront him about the policy’s that did non take topographic point he tells me non to worry about it that both bush leagues are guilty as wickedness and we can shut the instance. His actions are unethical and don’t non follow the policy of prosecuting the guilty. esteeming the rights of the accused. and making a safe community. Ethical motives is important in determinations affecting discretion. force. and due procedure. because condemnable justness professionals can be tempted to mistreat their powers ( Felkins. 1987 ) . I report this to my supervisor merely for him to state me to swear my spouse and travel to test.

Both suspects are arrested and bound for test. Bail is denied. I do non experience good about continuing with this. The organisational civilization represented by my supervisor gives the reply to my partners’ behaviour. The supervisor plays a big function in specifying organisational civilization by his actions and leading. Both my supervisor and my spouse have decided to utilize “moral relativism” which is the ethical premiss “that determinations about right and incorrect are purely personal and subjective and harmonizing to it. whatever anyone claims to be morally acceptable is morally acceptable. at least for that individual.

They have non thought about the effects of their actions and how they may be good or harmful from the consequence. In order to make so one must analyse the issues and do judgements by analyzing the inside informations of the instance. placing the relevant standards. finding possible class of action. and make up one’s minding which action is most ethical. I will take to detach myself from the instance. I can non afford to lose my occupation by non following the legal or ethical criterions. Torahs have punishments when instances are violated and these punishments can be really terrible if you violate legal norms. I believe that both my spouse and supervisor have violated legal norms every bit good as ethical criterions.

Mentions

Felkenes. G. ( 1987 ) . “Ethics in the Graduate Criminal Justice Curriculum. ” Teaching Philosophy 10 ( 1 ) : 23–26.

Ruggiero. V. R. ( 2008 ) . Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues ( Seventh ed. ) . New York. NY. USA: McGraw-Hill.