Keeping a positive. ethical behaviour is something that is hard no affair someone’s profession. If desired. the Navy is a calling pick that faces many ethical quandary. One current ethical issue that exists within the Navy is favoritism. Issue

Within the Navy. being ethical is a immense portion of your occupation. Because of its importance and badness. many notes. or occupation places. have been created within the Navy to turn to and cover with the current ethical issues. As stated by the Secretary of the Navy. Donald C. Winter. “It is indispensable that all Department of the Navy forces adhere to the highest criterions of unity and ethical behavior. The American people put their trust in us and none of us can bewray that trust. ” ( Winter ) Discrimination is one of the ethical quandary that plague the Navy. As defined by Trevino and Nelson. “Discrimination occurs whenever something other than makings affects how an employee is treated. ” ( Trevino & A ; Nelson. 2011. p. 116 ) Discrimination comes in multiple classs. In the United States. age. disablement. gender. natural beginning. faith. and race are signifiers that are prohibited by federal jurisprudence. ( Trevino & A ; Nelson. 2011. p. 115 ) Diverseness is a cardinal factor during your calling in the Navy.

The age difference amongst Sailors is drastic. and at any clip person who is 45 old ages old may be taking orders from person who is 25 old ages old. This causes a possible bitterness from crewmans because in the Navy. age means nil. Authority and leading is granted dependent upon one’s rank. or pay class. The oldest age to fall in the Navy is 39. This poses a high likeliness of working under person who is younger. Bing able to follow and give orders to and from everyone is an indispensable quality that is required to be a Sailor. When thought of using people with disablements. the Navy is non an employer that comes to mind. There are many people in the Navy that are disabled. Dyslexia. depression. sickle-cell anaemia. and ADD. amongst others. are all disablements that are considered admissible for entry into the Navy. Because the Navy is so diverse. being able to accept. work with. and acquire past one’s disablement is imperative. A big part of the Navy has to go. or deploy. from the United States and venture into other states. The opportunity of interacting with a individual who has a disablement is huge. Figure 1

Gender favoritism is one that is non excessively common in the Navy. The Navy became coeducational in March of 1917 when Loretta Walsh enlisted as a Yeoman. ( CAPT ( Ret. ) Wilson. 1996 ) Since so. adult females have been allowed to keep about every rate and rank. Figure 2 shows the per centum of work forces vs. adult females in the Navy in FY 2004. ( Dr. Maxfield. 2004 ) Womans are held to the same criterion as work forces and are expected to be able to execute their responsibilities every bit good as the work forces. Even though know aparting crewmans because of their gender is a shrinkage job. I feel it will go a thing of the yesteryear in the following 10 old ages. During my short clip in the Navy. I have come across many crewmans. normally 1s that are caught in the older Navy traditions. which are partial to working with adult females. I have besides found that depending on how and where person was raised ; there are still some that demonstrate gallantry. When the people who presently hold leading places throughout the Navy are cycled out. I believe know aparting person because of their gender will besides rhythm through. Natural origin diverseness is something that has been quickly turning and is represented throughout the twelvemonth. and highlighted each October during National Diversity Awareness Month.

Within the Navy. each bid has a Diversity Committee that contains work forces. adult females and Sailors from every race. background. and civilization. Their intent is to assist educate their bid and do diverseness something merriment and eventful. ““Diversity is portion of our nation’s heritage and helps supply strength within the Navy. says Capt. David Pimpo. FISC San Diego commanding officer. ”We have an duty to acknowledge our differences and observe them. ”” ( FISC San Diego Public Affairs Office. 2010 ) Freedom of faith has fallen under the First Amendment and been a portion of the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights since 1778. ( Robinson. 2010 ) The Navy offers religious services for about every faith available. I do non come across spiritual favoritism excessively frequently. but there are occasions where I have seen Muslims. who are pattern Islam. to be the most discriminated against faith. The Huffington Post studies since the September 11 onslaughts. “there has been a 150 per centum leap in workplace favoritism against Muslims” . ( Reuters. 2011 ) From my experiences. whenever any treatments about spiritual beliefs are brought up during work hours. the senior Sailor nowadays typically stops any faith based conversation from traveling any farther. Figure 2

Racial favoritism is one of the oldest signifiers of favoritism. The Navy has been officially desegregated since July 26. 1948. ( Truman. 1998 ) From the 2004 financial twelvemonth informations of Active Duty and Reserve Sailors. including Officers. Warrant Officers. and Enlisted. Figure 2 shows the Race/Ethnicity diverseness within the Navy. ( Dr. Maxfield. 2004 ) Stakeholder Analysis

When favoritism occurs within the Navy. everyone is affected. The armed forces is funded by the authorities. which receives money from all the revenue enhancement remunerators. If the Navy does non implement such rigorous regulations against favoritism. Sailors will be disciplined by the UCMJ under Article 92. Once penalized. the armed forces is still responsible for lodging. eating. and caring for the punished person until their sentence is completed or they are discharged from the military. In order to fund this. the states revenue enhancement remunerators are still responsible for the Sailor until his/her discharge. The Navy as a whole is besides penalized for the actions of single crewmans. Once person becomes a crewman. they are no longer known by merely their name. For illustration. if a crewman gets a DUI. the paper will non read. “John Doe receives DUI after crashing into phone pole” . Alternatively. the paper will read “Local US Navy Sailor clangs into phone pole” .

The Navy is scrutinized because of the actions of those within it. Once a crewman makes a error that is serious plenty for him/her to be disciplined. their life will ne’er be the same. If dishonorably discharged from the military. your opportunities of acquiring a civilian occupation are tantamount to those of a criminal. Their life and anyone that is or was dependent upon them will alter drastically. There is a slender chance to obtain a federal occupation. many province occupations or a firearm license. The Dishonorably Discharged individual may waste their vote rights and the opportunity of a college instruction. “The U. S. Constitution does non acknowledge the class of “felons” or “dishonorably discharged” persons as a protected category. This means that a bank or company may lawfully know apart against person on the footing of the individual’s dishonourable discharge. ” ( Kinsley. 2013 )

Analysis and Recommendations
I believe there to be many implicit in causes to favoritism within the Navy. The fright of the unknown and of person different from themselves may be excessively implausible for person to manage. Some persons may hold been raised in such a manner to non accept persons who are different than them. Where a individual is raised is besides a factor in the forming of their belief system. The deceit of facts and rumours may take person to believe that prejudiced beliefs are all right and acceptable. I believe that media besides plays a immense function in what information is put out and the cogency of that information may ne’er be released.

In the Navy. there are many mercantile establishments that person could utilize if they believe they are being discriminated against. Within each bid there is at least one Senior Sailor who runs the Command CMEO plan. Command Managed Equal Opportunity. The CMEO is person who sailors can speak to at any clip. and without fright of revenge from their concatenation of bid. “The aim of Command Managed Equal Opportunity is to advance positive bid morale and quality of life by supplying an environment in which all forces can execute to their maximal ability. unimpeded by institutional or single prejudices based on race. colour. ethnicity. national beginning. gender or spiritual stereotypes. Command leaders must make. form. and keep a positive EO environment through policy. communicating. preparation. instruction. enforcement and appraisal. ” ( US Navy. 2013 ) Decision

Having strong. ethical beliefs are an indispensable tool that will acquire you far in the Navy. Discrimination is non merely unethical. but illegal and goes against the curse that every service member recited before entry into the Navy. There are first-class resources that the Navy provides to larn and interact with people from every age. disablement. gender. natural beginning. faith. and race. The CMEO plan that the Navy has implemented is one that I have personally seen to be effectual. With all of the information available today. there should be no ground for favoritism to happen in the Navy.

Mentions

CAPT ( Ret. ) Wilson. B. A. ( 1996 ) . Military Women “Firsts” . Retrieved February 1. 2013. from userpages. com: hypertext transfer protocol: //userpages. aug. com/captbarb/firsts. hypertext markup language Dr. Maxfield. B. D. ( 2004. September 15 ) . Figures 1 and 2. FY04 Profile of Navy. FISC San Diego Public Affairs Office. ( 2010. October 13 ) . FISC San Diego Diversity Committee Hosts Hispanic Heritage Month Celebration. Retrieved February 1. 2013. from navy. mil: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. navy. mil/submit/display. asp? story_id=56552 Kinsley. K. ( 2013 ) . What is the Impact of a Dishonorable Discharge? Retrieved February 1. 2013. from eHow. com: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. ehow. com/about_6674442_impact-dishonorable-discharge_ . hypertext markup language Reuters. T. ( 2011. March 29 ) . Muslim Discrimination Cases Disproportionately High In U. S. Retrieved February 1. 2013. from huffingtonpost. com: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. huffingtonpost. com/2011/03/29/muslim-discrimination-cas_n_842076. hypertext markup language Robinson. B. ( 2010. April 30 ) . The first amendment to the U. S. Constitution: Religious facets. Retrieved February 1. 2013. from religioustolerance. org: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. religioustolerance. org/amend_1. htm Trevino. L. A. . & A ; Nelson. K. A. ( 2011 ) . Pull offing Business Ethical motives: Straight Talk About How To Make It Right ( 5 ed. ) . Hoboken. New jersey: John Wiley & A ; Sons. Truman. H. S. ( 1998. October 15 ) . Integration of the Armed Services. Retrieved February 1. 2013. from Naval History and Heritage Command: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. history. navy. mil/faqs/faq59-17. htm US Navy. ( 2013 ) . COMMAND MANAGED EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ( CMEO ) PROGRAM. Retrieved February 1. 2013. from navy. mil: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. public. navy. mil/airfor/nalo/Pages/CMEO. aspx Winter. D. C. ( n. d. ) . Secretary of the Navy Statement on Ethics. Retrieved February 1. 2013. from moralss. naval forces. mil: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. moralss. naval forces. mil/content/secnavmsgstatement. aspx