Moon Essay Essay, Research Paper

Moon

An object can stand for many different things to many different people. One object of involvement is the Moon. Philip Larkin, the talker of Sad Steps, and Sir Philip Sidney, talker of sonnet 31 from Astrophel and Stella, have different feelings and attitudes towards the Moon. Each talker uses assorted rhetorical devices to show their sentiment of the Moon. Larkin uses these devices to demo his resentment and the pathetic nature of the Moon and what people think of it, and Sir Philip Sidney uses these devices to predominate his esteem of the Moon in its grace amongst the stars.

Sir Philip Sidney is in a province of awe when faced by the Moon. He believes that the Moon has the replies to all of his inquiries. He asks, through a series of rhetorical inquiries, whether? they call virtuousness there ungratefulness? ? ( line 15 ) , or whether? they above love to be loved, and yet/ Those lovers scorn whom that love doth possess? ? ( line 13-14 ) . Sir Philip Sideney believes that the replies to these inquiries can be found out from the Moon, for the Moon is all-knowing. He farther believes that the Moon? can judge of love? , and can work out his love problems, as a? lozenge of love? ( Sad Steps, line 11 ) would. Sir Philip Sidney? s attitude toward the Moon is rather serious, which is besides the tone of the essay. He takes the Moon really earnestly, as if it were godly. He adds character to the Moon, as if it were a individual. He describes the Moon? s? love acquainted eyes? ( Li

ne 5 ) and comments how? wan a face? ( line 2 ) it has. This imagination makes the Moon more existent and applaudable, for how can you look up to a individual without a face? The imagination adds a face to the Moon for others to look up to as does himself. Philip Larkin? s attitude toward the Moon is rather different, although there is a definite connexion between the two verse forms.

Larkin? s attitude toward the Moon is rather acrimonious. Larkin is rough and sarcastic in his verse form when speaking of the Moon. He teases Sidney? s position of the Moon, naming it a? Lozenge of love! Medallion of art! / O wolves of memory! Immensements! ? ( lines 11-12 ) when Larkin really believes the Moon is merely a sad? reminder of the strength and pain/ Of being immature ; that it can? t come once more? ( line 17 ) . Larkin seems resentful to the Moon for reminding him of the young person which can ne’er be revived in him. He uses terse and jerky sentences, which gives the Moon a rough, ? barbarian? semblance. Larkin? s verse form has a much more negative tone to it than Sidney? s. Larkin describes the Moon as holding a cold? broad stare? ( line 15 ) and a? hardness and brightness? ( line 14 ) that could do one? shudder somewhat? ( line 13 ) . It about seems that Larkin is express joying at Sidney? s mentality on the Moon.

Even though both talkers are looking at the same object, they do non see the same object. Sidney seems like a faithful retainer and supporter of the Moon, while Larkin scorns the Moon? s acuteness and hardness. It is astonishing how many different attitudes people can hold about an object.