I will be reviewing two different articles. Both surveies are nursing surveies that evaluate results. I will be following specific cardinal points for a quantitative position and a qualitative position. There is a guideline that I will be following for each article that includes identifying and analyzing the information aggregation and informations analysis methodological analysiss used in each survey. The names of the articles are The Experience of Patients Undergoing Awake Craniotomy and The Effectss of Crossed Leg Blood Pressure Measurement.
The mentions will besides be reviewed to find cogency and relationship to the new survey. Data Collection Quantitative Study: The operational and conceptual definition is congruous. The cardinal variables were operationalized utilizing the best possible method and with equal justification. Specific instruments were adequately described and were good picks. given the survey intent. the variables being studied. and the survey population. The instrument used specifically was a blood force per unit area proctor. The blood force per unit area turnup size. dimensions. and rising prices force per unit area were described.
The blood force per unit area proctor was adequately pretested and calibrated before the survey began by a biomedical technician ( Foster-Fitzpatrick. Ortiz. Sibilano. Marcantonio. & A ; Braun. 1999 ) . It can be determined that the informations aggregation methods provided informations that was dependable and valid. The intercession executed was holding patients cross their legs and mensurating their blood force per unit area. The intercession was adequately described and implemented. The execution of the intercession was faithful to its program ( Polit & A ; Beck. 2012 ) .
The information was gathered by trained nurse research workers ( Foster-Fitzpatrick et al. . 1999 ) . The same blood force per unit area proctor was operated during the informations aggregation to minimise prejudices ( Foster-Fitzpatrick et al. . 1999 ) . Qualitative Survey: The methods for garnering informations were appropriate and the information was gathered utilizing interviews over a span of 2 yearss ( Palese. Skrap. Fachin. Visioli. & A ; Zannini. 2008 ) . It could be determined that triangulation was achieved since the interviews were performed on legion occasions and during miscellaneous fortunes.
The research workers did inquire the right inquiries and do the right observations. which were besides recorded in an appropriate manner. It can be concluded that sufficient information was gathered. given the particulars required to be a factor in this survey. The information collected was adequately rich in deepness and item. The information was gathered utilizing interviews with open-ended inquiries. The interviews were audio-recorded. The information digest tools were valid and dependable for this survey. Data aggregation was adequately described and appeared appropriate for this type of survey.
Bias was kept to a lower limit. The research workers were to find and acknowledge thoughts that may hold prompted or provoked personal prejudices. they besides had to acknowledge any personal experiences or beliefs that might hold influenced what they were traveling to hear and describe ( Palese et Al. . 2008 ) . Data Analysis Quantitative Study: Analysiss were appropriated to reply the research inquiry and to prove the hypothesis. The research workers performed assorted blood force per unit area measurings on a sample of hypertensive males to find if the crossing of a leg has an consequence on blood force per unit area measurings.
Appropriate statistical methods were used given the degree of measuring and premises of the trial. However. there was merely one specific group that was the variable. 100 hypertensive males whose ages ranged from 31 to 81. Hypothesis proving allows research workers to do nonsubjective determinations whether survey consequences likely reflect opportunity sample differences or true population differences ( Polit & A ; Beck. 2012 ) . In this survey there was no control group. Then. how can we find that traversing your leg would increase blood force per unit area. It is disputing to back up whether a type I and type II mistakes were really minimized or avoided.
The intercession surveies did non execute an intention-to-treat analysis. All of the participants were treated and there was no omitted information. The participants besides did non abandon the survey. The jobs of losing values were evaluated and adequately addressed. The restriction of the survey includes gender and sample size. The research workers discussed the failings with solutions for future surveies. The research workers recommend retroflexing this survey utilizing a larger sample size that includes females. They consider that these alterations would increase the significance of the consequences.
The findings are discussed and interpreted. Information about statistical significance and assurance interval is presented and reviewed. There was good usage of tabular arraies and figures that included rubrics and headers that were clearly and suitably labeled. The consequences were besides clearly displayed in tabular arraies with identifiable rubrics and labelled headers. The survey included descriptive statistics. The survey described the chief features in the dataset. The mean and standard divergence for each blood force per unit area measuring was calculated before and after traversing of the legs was performed by the survey topics.
Inferential statistics were besides present in this survey. In order to prove average differences with three or more groups. an analysis of discrepancy ( ANOVA ) statistical trial is used. This research survey conducted a repeated-measure ANOVA. which is when there are three or more steps of the same dependant variable for each participant ( Polit & A ; Beck. 2012 ) . Measuring blood force per unit area at assorted intervals and under legion conditions for the same topic is one incident where this type of proving can be used. . The theoretical account for this design was repeated steps analysis of discrepancy ( ANOVA ) .
The degree of significance in this survey was stated at & lt ; 0. 05 for all three effects in the theoretical account. ( before traversing the legs. during legs crossed. and after holding crossed the legs ) . This significance degree indicates that research workers accept a hazard that out of 100 samples drawn from a population. a true void hypothesis would be rejected 5 times ( Polit & A ; Beck. 2012 ) . Given the degree of measuring and the nature of the hypothesis. the consequences were equal. However. I believe that farther research is required to hold a stronger correlativity.
A wider trying population should be used in future research to hold more accurate decisions. Qualitative Survey: The information direction and information analysis methods were sufficiently described. The information analysis scheme was compatible with the research tradition. It was besides compatible with the nature and type of informations gathered. The findings are efficaciously summarized. There was good usage of commendations from the patient interviews. The research workers were able to abstract constructs that were found in the informations collected from the interviews.
Although each patient had a alone experience. the research workers were able to categorise constructs from the informations that was analyzed. Research workers were able to group these constructs into pre-operative concerns. intra-operative concerns. and post-operative concerns. Since there was limited research conducted on intra-operative experiences there were bounds with the ability of being able to associate it to antecedently performed surveies. However. the survey did acknowledge the bounds it had. Since this is a qualitative survey. by and large these surveies can non be generalized to the population.
Qualitative research workers are non concerned with the general population. but instead with topics experiences ( Polit & A ; Beck. 2012 ) . The research workers did admit the importance of the health care squad members to believe about patient’s experiences in order to better understand how to prioritise the demands of the patient ( Palese et Al. . 2008 ) . I believe that prejudices were kept to a minimum sing the executions that the research workers were exposed to at the beginning of the survey and before they were exposed to the interviews or observations.
The composing and geographic expedition of the informations produced echt and important descriptions of the experiences that the patients whom were topics had. Summary After reexamining both articles and reviewing each one. I believe to hold a better understanding about the difference between a quantitative research survey and a qualitative research survey. Data aggregation should be systematic and punctilious. Both surveies gathered their informations consistently and meticulously. In position of the statistical analysis. degrees of measuring should be defined as nominal. ordinal. interval or ratio degree informations.
Beginnings of informations can be documental beginnings as primary and secondary beginnings. field beginnings as topics in individual. conditions. environment and events that are discernible and mensurable. and historical information. Both of the surveies besides had these types of beginnings. The methods of roll uping informations include studies oppugning utilizing interview agenda and questionnaires. observation techniques with the aid of structured or unstructured instruments. and mensurating with standardised instruments. Both of the surveies besides used some of these methods for roll uping informations.
The intent of analysing informations in a survey is to depict the informations in meaningful footings. For illustration. the survey in mention to blood force per unit area alterations utilised tabular arraies for reading. Statisticss help to reply of import research inquiries and it is the replies to such inquiries that farther our apprehensions. It is required the research worker to hold an apprehension of what tools are suited for a peculiar research survey. Depending on the sorts of variables identified ( nominal. ordinal. interval. and ratio ) and the design of peculiar survey. figure of statistical techniques is available to analyse informations. The information aggregation and informations analysis methodological analysiss used varied and followed the peculiar demand of each research survey. The research workers followed the research procedure guidelines and methodological analysiss. Although. both surveies had some failings. they were both performed adequately. utilizing appropriate techniques and instruments. They were besides both performed with unity. discoursing their restrictions and failings.
