Prison Alternative Essay, Research Paper

& # 8220 ; The Prison Alternative & # 8221 ;

America has to wake up and recognize that the current construction of our penal system is neglecting awfully. Take a group of people, strip them of ownerships and privateness, expose them to constant menaces of force, overcrowd their cell-block, strip them of meaningful work, and the consequence is an embittered lower class more purpose on acquiring even with society than lending to it. There is a better manner to cover with offense and penalty in America.

Americans pay excessively much money for prisons to neglect so severely. Like many large authorities solutions, prisons are expensive. In the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1997, the Bureau of Justice Statistics estimates the entire cost for our judicial system for 1993. That twelvemonth, the United States had 1,364,881 grownup gaol and prison inmates. Based on this information, the cost per inmate for corrections, judicial, legal, and constabulary costs totaled $ 71,467 per inmate. That is about the same as the cost of directing a pupil to a four-year college. Due to overcrowding, more than ten billion dollars in building is needed to make sufficient infinite for merely the current prison population. & # 8220 ; Building more prisons to turn to offense is like constructing more cemeteries to turn to a fatal disease. & # 8221 ; ( Robert Gangi, Executive Director, Correctional Association of New York )

Ervin 2

Prisons take the nonviolent wrongdoer and do him populate in the same conditions that a hard-boiled slayer would hold. The very nature of prison, no affair how humanist society efforts to do it, produces an environment that is necessarily harmful to its occupants. Even by detaining release by longer sentences, occupants will finally return to damage the community.

Society is paying the measure for this unfairness to travel on. Not including Federal Funds, states exhausted $ 28.9 billion on corrections in 1997 entirely. To compare, the provinces merely spent $ 14.0 billion on public assistance to the hapless ( National Association of State Budget Officers 1997 ) . Why should we coerce taxpayers to pay to maintain nonviolent felons sitting in prison cells where they become acrimonious and more likely to reiterate their discourtesies when released? The authorities must invent new ways to penalize the guilty, and still pull off to maintain American citizens satisfied that our justness system is effectual.

Alternatively, why non set non violent felons to work in damages plans outside prison where they could pay back the victims of their offenses? In 1995, merely 13 % of all province captives were violent wrongdoers ( US Department of Justice Report, & # 8220 ; Prisoners in 1996 & # 8243 ; ) . The authorities should originate work plans ; where the condemnable receives a undertaking and must release his or her net incomes to the victim of their offense until the mental and physical amendss of their victims are satisfied. A tribunal will find how much money the felon will hold to pay for his damages costs, and what occupation the felon will hold to make to pay back that damages. The most obvious benefit of this attack is that it takes attention of the victim, the disregarded individual in the current system. Where locking people up fails, restituti

on offers the felon a means to do a existent alteration of character. Nothing can destruct a man’s mind more

Ervin 3

certainly than populating without utile productive work and intent. By supplying an alternate to imprisonment for nonviolent felons, damages reduces the

demand for taxpayers to go on edifice prisons. Working with the intent of paying back their victim allows a condemnable to understand and cover with the existent effects of his or her actions. Furthermore, damages would be far less expensive than the current system. The cost per captive can be every bit low as 10 per centum of that of captivity, depending on the grade of supervising necessary. If we initiate this signifier of justness for the lesser wrongdoer, our prisons will hold the vacancies to imprison the Jeffery Dahmers of the universe in prison for life.

Jack Kemp, writer of Crime and Punishment in Modern America said, & # 8220 ; The thought that a burglar should return stolen goods, wage for harm to the house he broke into and pay his victims for the clip lost from work to look at a test meets with cosmopolitan support from the American people. & # 8221 ; The construct of damages entreaties to America & # 8217 ; s sense of justness.

Restitution would discourage offense with at least every bit much effectivity as prison. Damages plans would greatly cut down the incidence of farther offense, since they restore a sense of single duty, doing the wrongdoer less likely to perpetrate offenses. Furthermore, better suited to set to society when their sentence is over. It is non so much the type of penalty that deters offense, but instead the certainty of penalty.

With regard to disincentive, about any countenance that is received rapidly and certainly will hold a deterrent consequence. An effectual and sharply run damages plan would be a greater hindrance than the menace of

Ervin 4

imprisonment. The certainty of damages, by necessitating payment, takes the net income out of offense.

Many Americans believe in our current prison system, and believe that it is an effectual signifier of penalty for the felon. Some people say that felons can populate decent, civilized lives in prison and alumnus to decent civilised lives in the free universe. How can criminals unrecorded civilized lives in an environment that lone offers them strife and mild signifiers of lawlessness? Most inmates learn small of value during their parturiency behind bars, largely because they adapt to prison in immature and frequently self-defeating ways. As a consequence, they leave prison unimproved, and sometimes well worse than when they went in.

Crime is the consequence of morally responsible people doing hapless moral determinations, for which we must keep wrongdoers accountable. They have broken the jurisprudence ; they have hurt others. If we do non take a firm stand that those who commit offenses responsible for their actions, we begin a slide into lawlessness. Nevertheless, the wrongdoer can be held responsible in many ways. It is in our best involvement to happen those ways that heal lesions, non do new 1s. Let us non pull the leg of ourselves any longer, prisons were ne’er designed to bring around the person ; they exist to lock him up.