The Crucible Essay, Research Paper

The book, The Crucible by Arthur Miller, is a well-written play of how scapegoating gone to the extreme can convey approximately enormous contention and chaos even among the simplest of people. In this instance, the victims of scapegoating were the citizens of Salem, Massachusetts. I feel that Miller did an first-class occupation on the manner in which he conveyed the scene, characters, and secret plan. The narrative takes topographic point in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. In their society there is merely black and white, right and incorrect. Given that the epoch is the 1600 s we know that their lives weren t really complex back so. The people back so chiefly farmed and worked from Sun up boulder clay sun down. Therefore we know that they were a simple-minded people. The characters in this book were all necessary for the reader to hold the full cognition of what was traveling on in the narrative. The characters in this narrative are dynamic and have of import functions. There are three chief characters: Abigail Williams, John Proctor and Deputy Governor Danforth. Abigail is a disdainful and juggling adult female who will halt at nil until the last dissembler is dead ( 150 ) . Her motive is to salvage her ain ego no affair what the cost may be to anyone else. Proctor s motive is to seek to do sense out of all of the lunacy traveling on around him. Danforth is an improbably obstinate adult male. His function in the narrative is that he is the justice of the witchery tests but he considers about all intangible grounds as cogent evidence and rejects about all touchable cogent evidence that is submitted to him. The scene and characters were indispensable to the flowering of the plot.Some misss were seen in the forest purportedly raising up the Satan in the forests by Reverend Samuel Parris but before he could place all who were at that place, the misss fled. Parris managed to place two misss ; his niece Abigail Williams and his girl Betty. Abigail claims that assorted people have practiced witchery on her and that she was wholly guiltless, when in fact, she is the guilty 1. Throughout the book people are faulting witchery on each other and surprisingly adequate people are really being hung based on here-say instead than true grounds. One of the lone people who can see this lunacy is John Proctor. He one time said to Danforth, There are them that will curse to anything before they ll bent ; have you of all time thought of that ( 69 ) . Pro

ctor subsequently confessed that he had committed criminal conversation in the past with Abigail Williams. His ain married woman denies the accusal in hopes to avoid any public embarrassment on her hubby and herself. This action incriminates Proctor and he is send to imprison waiting for a decease sentence. Danforth makes a trade with Proctor ; that if he confessed that he had practiced witchery, he would non be hung, otherwise he would be. The flood tide of this narrative is when Proctor marks the false confession and subsequently decides to rupture it up to go forth himself some pride and self-respect.

Arthur Miller conveyed the scene, characters, and secret plan really good. Each of the three was portrayed brightly. I am amazed that something this absurd has really happened in Salem, Massachusetts. Personally I am glad that I don t live in a society that patterns such nonsensical. Work Cited Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. New York: Penguin Books, 1981. Given all of the legion characters in the book, I would hold to state that I am most like John Proctor. Give that he was a hero, which I m non, I think that I have some of the same features that he had. He was an honest adult male throughout the narrative, and when he wasn T he confessed his wickednesss. He even confessed to perpetrating criminal conversation. Elizabeth, I have confessed it ( 113 ) . I try to be honest at all times. However sometimes I fall short of that end but when I do my scruples makes me experience guilty and about ever, I right the incorrect. Work Cited Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.I think that a major issue today is parents utilizing the schools as a whipping boy for boisterous kids. I personally have heard more than one parent blame the school system in general for certain jobs that they are holding with their kids. Parents tend to fault everyone else but themselves. Parents have no right to fault anyone else but themselves. They need to halt being so concerned with the hoarded wealths of life and concentrate more on their childs. I don t think that instructors are acclaimed plenty for the great things that they do every twenty-four hours to break the lives of their pupils. They deal with much more than what is on their occupation description and aren T given adequate recognition for it. If parents would merely pass another 20 proceedingss with their childs each twenty-four hours the effects of this would be astronomically positive and America would go a better topographic point because of this.