Identify and sum up the phases of group development
Harmonizing to the text. Christine and the group are in the phases of struggle as shown in figure 10. 2. Ancestors. Felt struggle. Manifest struggle. Conflict declaration. and Conflict suppression. Professor Thiel assigns each group a undertaking to be evaluated by their equals. Mike seems a small distant at the first meeting and ne’er desiring to fall in the group. When Mike bumped into them at school holding tiffin. he would give them a obscure expression. They ne’er spoke to him or the professor about this state of affairs. Identify Key Problems

The primary job for the group is their category members will be measuring how they dealt with job at manus and Mike isn’t doing it any better by non collaborating or matching with the squad. The secondary job is Christine and the group is seeking to cover with Mike without the Professor being involved. Christine and the squad should hold noticed how distant Mike was during the first meeting. They should hold gone to Professor Thiel after he declined and came up with an alibi non to go to any meetings. cognizing he would impact their overall class. Given that there is no “one perfect solution” for this state of affairs. place. describe. and support two possible solutions to the primary job ( s ) . The category was put into groups to finish a undertaking which will be evaluated. Mike ne’er wanted to take part in the group meetings ; he gave Christine notes on their undertaking. Everyone in their group was capable of transporting on without Mike. If they didn’t hold his input and cooperation they were to discourse the affair with the professor. Harmonizing to the text. Christine compromised with him. seeking to acquire him to run into with the remainder of the group. She done everything she could to sympathize with him sing his girlfriend.

Christine and the group should hold gone to the professor about their job foremost. now. if they were to manage this job on their ain. They should hold voted on taking Mike from the squad and go on on with their undertaking. This would hold been the reply or solution to their undertaking at manus and perchance receives a good class. Discuss whether Christine was an effectual group leader in this instance. Why or why non?

Christine could hold been stricter toward Mike. being this was a category undertaking and he had no respect for the following individual. She should hold brought this to the Professor’s attending and dismissed him. Christine should hold given Mike certain undertakings to make and hold him to turn them to her or drop it off to one of the other squad members. this would demo that he was seeking and seting out on his portion of the work. Having him to finish these undertakings perchance would convey him from being so distant from them. These undertakings for Mike could work toward her advantage and she wouldn’t be up worrying.