Technology Essay, Research Paper
The Light and Dark Side of DNA Technology
As with most modern progresss, DNA engineering has opened the door to a huge new universe of find. On the positive side, DNA aids us in the battle against disease, such as malignant neoplastic disease, and many familial upsets, such as muscular dystrophy. Yet many in society are concerned with the ethical issue of utilizing DNA in affairs such as cloning, familial meddling, and the irratication of less than perfect foetuss ensuing selective human reproduction.
Most diseases have a familial footing, hence if scientists are able to turn up the cistrons that are responsible for diseases, it would help in the intervention and bar of disease. Deoxyribonucleic acid is the edifice block of life, and therefore it is the base of everything that is populating. James Watson, a good known scientist and laminitis of the Human Genome Project, has this input on genetic sciences. & # 8220 ; If you can analyze life from the degree of DNA, you have a existent account for its procedures & # 8221 ; ( Watson, 530 ) . Watson believes that if scientists are able to acquire the complete description of a bacteria, it would do an extraordinary minute in our history. Puttering with Destiny written by Shannon Brownlee, Gareth Cook, and Viva Hardigg, includes a perfect illustration of disease bar through familial research. The Kostakis household learned that due to their familial make-ups household members were highly subseptable to colon malignant neoplastic disease, even those in their teens, nevertheless thanks to modern familial research, steps were taken to forestall the malignant neoplastic disease from organizing, therefore saving the lives of many in their household.
& # 8220 ; Parents in the biotic century will be progressively driven to make up one’s mind whether to take their opportunities with the traditional familial lottery U
sing their ain unchanged egg and sperm, cognizing their kids may inherit some “undesirable” traits, or undergo disciplinary cistron alterations on their sperm, egg, embryo, or foetus, or replace egg or sperm from a giver through in vitro fertilisation and surrogacy arrangements” ( Rifkin, 547 ) . In this approaching century of scientific progresss, a parent’s failure to rectify any familial defects in utero might merely be considered a flagitious offense. This seems wholly hideous, nevertheless female parents have already been held apt for giving birth to check cocaine addicted babes and babes with foetal intoxicant syndrome. Yet no offense is committed if that same female parent aborts the foetus. Our society believes that a parent has a duty to supply a safe and stable milieus for their unborn kid. Will this belief be carried over to include familial neutering of a foetus? “Proponents of human familial technology argue that it would be barbarous and irresponsible non to utilize this powerful new engineering to extinguish serious ‘genetic disorders’ ” ( Rifkin, 548 ) .
There are ever inquiries asked when scientific discipline progresss. Is at that place a bound to how far one goes? Should we go on to progress and allow scientific discipline find our destiny? Is it just for a physician or scientist to state a individual at age ten that they will develop colon malignant neoplastic disease at age 30 based on their household cistrons? Should society let this country of medical specialty to go on or halt it now? Genetic research has come a long manner, and yesterdays progresss criticized by many in the past are now heralded for their part to the remedy of malignant neoplastic diseases and many diseases. Caution is necessary in some cases, but allow us non be speedy to hit down modern medical progresss before we see what benefits can be attained that will profit the human race.
