The Outsider Essay, Research Paper

The characters of the chaplain, in Albert Camus & # 8217 ; The Outsider, and the priest, in Franz Kafka & # 8217 ; s The Trial, are rather similar, and are polar to the development of the novel. These characters serve essentialy to convey the inquiry of God and faith to examine the existential philosopher facets of it, in novels wholly devoid of spiritual context. The chief thought seeable about these two characters is that they are both the last 1s seen by the supporters, Mearsault and K. , both non-believers in the word of the Godhead. Whereas the chaplain in The Outsider attempts to do Mearsault believe in the being of God, the priest tries to warn and explicate to K. what will go on to him. The ground the chaplain is the last one to see Mearsault is becasue it & # 8217 ; s his occupation to allow the prisioners have a concluding shooting at salvation before they are executed. The ground that K. meets with the priest is out of advice given to him by person, and he is the last character that he shows K. interacting with ( although it might be true that K. meets and interacts with other people after the meeting, but they are neither mentioned nor seeable subsequently on ) . The priest doesn & # 8217 ; t seek and do K. confess or anything of the kind, he is chiefly at that place to discourse with the character, his spiritual place is about put to no usage. The existentialist position of faith is that worlds h

ave been alienated from god, from each other, and so forth. In the novel Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, the christian idea of salvation through suffering is omnipresent throughout the novel. What is visible with The Trial and The Outsider is that they don’t touch on the aspect of religion much throughout the story (The Outsider has bits and pieces of it appearing in his cross examinations but they are used more to mock than in an analitical sense). The presence of these two characters at the end of the novel serves to cover all the existentialist areas known to existemtialists (although it is doubtful whether the authors consciously attempted to make the character’s present because of any existentialist rules they had to follow). The characters are required to structure the novels, beside the obvious existentialist areas. The characters are there to let the protagonist’s blow off some steam. In all the beaurocracy, confusion, and incompetence these two remain as the only ones that understand the predicament of the protaganists. They actually seem to understand what the protagonists are going through. The priest is more direct, yet symbolic, with K., telling him a story laden with symbolism and telling him what he’s about to go through. The chaplain tries to take advantage of what he understands about Mearsault, and take control of his ideas in his final moments.