The Tradgedy Of Julius Caesar Essay, Research Paper

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar does non concentrate on Caesar. Although the secret plan of the

narrative revolves around him, the focal point of the narrative is on his lover, Marcus Brutus. Because of

this, Caesar & # 8217 ; s character remains an mystery. He envisions himself as an unbeatable God,

nevertheless Shakespeare portrays Caesar as a common adult male with many failings.

& # 8220 ; The Gods do this in shame of cowardliness. Caesar should be a animal without a bosom if

he should remain at place today for fright. No, Caesar shall non. Danger knows full well that

Caesar is more unsafe than he. We are two king of beastss littered in one twenty-four hours, and I the senior and

more awful, and Caesar shall travel away & # 8221 ; ( p.75 ) . These words, spoken by Caesar, demo how

he thought of himself. He believed that no 1 would be fool plenty to seek to convey any injury

to him, for he was powerful and godlike. However, this train of idea was what led

Caesar to his ruin.

Many people thought of Caesar as an narcissistic and dogged adult male who had the

bosom of a autocrat and who could be expected to oppress any staying autonomies of the Romans

under his pess. Most of the clip, he spoke about himself in the 3rd individual which gives an

chesty feeling of Caesar to the reader. This is shown as Cassius spoke to Casca about the

upcoming confederacy. & # 8220 ; What rubbish is Rome, what rubbish and what offal, when it serves for

the base affair illuminate so vile a thing as Caesar! & # 8221 ; ( p.45 ) .

Caesar was by no agencies merely shown as a foolish adult male who thought extremely of himself.

Caesar & # 8217 ; s statements about his dist

rust of Cassius are right. Caesar has every alibi for

mistrusting Cassius, who was already plotting his slaying. & # 8220 ; Yond Cassius has a thin and

hungry expression ; he thinks excessively much, and such work forces are unsafe & # 8221 ; ( p.27 ) . Caesar even puts his

finger on Cassius & # 8217 ; primary motivation, which is enviousness. Shakespeare gave Caesar homo

failings to give world to Caesar as a adult male. The drama could non hold shown a high degree of

calamity if Caesar had merely been portrayed as a adult male who thought of himself as a God. So

Shakespeare interpreted the confederacy as a senseless secret plan formulated by a group of

self-serving Lords and politicians under the leading of a ill-conceived lover of Caesar.

At the beginning of Act 1 Scene 2, Caesar talked to Antony about touching

Calpurnia, Caesar & # 8217 ; s married woman, because Calpurnia was unfertile and Caesar believed that the touch

might hold taken the asepsis off. & # 8220 ; Forget non in your velocity, Antonius, to touch Calpurnia ;

for our seniors say the waste, touched in this clasp pursuit, agitate off their unfertile expletive & # 8221 ; ( p. 15 ) .

That showed another failing of Caesar & # 8217 ; s, nevertheless Caesar believed that it was Calpurnia & # 8217 ; s

imperfectness for non being able to hold a kid.

Shakespeare had given Caesar many mistakes which led to his decease. Most of Caesar & # 8217 ; s

chesty ideas were merely stepping rocks which led to the success of the confederacy. The

most critical of these ideas and beliefs was Caesar & # 8217 ; s thought that he was unbeatable. If

Caesar had non been influenced by what people thought of him but was concerned about his

life, Caesar wouldn & # 8217 ; Ts have fallen victim to the confederacy.