Who Walk Away From Omelas Essay, Research Paper

Literary Essay:

& # 8220 ; The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas & # 8221 ;

At times, in order for one to be happy, one may sometimes base and compare their felicity on the bad lucks of others. The Child, in the narrative & # 8220 ; The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas & # 8221 ; by Ursula K. Leguin, is used as a important symbol to efficaciously make emotional responses in the readers mind, and is besides used to knock the members of today & # 8217 ; s society. Finally in the terminal, the symbol of the kid relays a strong message to the reader, refering the bases of 1s felicity.

Throughout the full narrative, because of the effectual description used, the writer was able to capture the readers emotions in many different ways. To get down, a kid portrays images of artlessness, comeliness, and other such beautified features. A kid is a human being, who as any other, has feelings and emotions. However, in this short narrative, the kid was portrayed as wholly different.

& # 8220 ; It is so thin there are no calves to its legs ; its belly protrudes ; it lives on a

half-bowl of maize repast and grease a twenty-four hours. It is bare. Its natess and thighs

are a mass of festered sores, as it sits in its ain body waste continually. & # 8221 ;

( Le Guin, p. 258 )

Furthermore, the reader besides becomes cognizant of the filthy, insanitary milieus that the kid is subjected to. ( Le Guin, p. 259 ) After being given such a elaborate description of the kid, every bit good as his/her environment, feelings of commiseration, and disgust come in the readers mind. Furthermore, when the reader realizes that it is because of this shocking kid that the citizens of Omelas receive their felicity, and that the exclusive ground for this kid & # 8217 ; s being is merely because he/she is used as a forfeit ; the reader so begins to see feelings of incredulity and unhappiness for the kid. The kid is portrayed with the usage of such graphic description so that the reader is able to experience sympathetic towards the kid, and possibly come to realisation of what society is like today.

In this narrative, the writer gives the reader an thought of how barbarous and selfish those in a society can be when it comes to their ain lucks. When the citizens of Omelas see the kid, some feel commiseration, and some Don & # 8217 ; t. & # 8220 ; Often the immature people go place in cryings, or in a dry-eyed fury, when they have seen the kid and faced this awful paradox. & # 8221 ; ( Le Guin, p.259 ) However, what do they make to set an terminal to this type of inhuman treatment towards this kid? Nothing. Sure they feel as though

they would wish to, but how many truly make? The writer seems to utilize the symbol of this kid to do the readers, as members of society, become cognizant of issues such as this, that are happening often in the universe today. In the narrative, it seems as though the citizens of Omelas are denying what the kid is forced to travel through. Although they become cognizant of the conditions the kid is capable to, and how abused he/she is by the citizens of Omelas, ( Le Guin, p. 258 ) they do non desire to alter the state of affairs, for if they did, it would intend the discontinuance of their ain felicity.

& # 8220 ; If the kid were brought up into the sunshine out of that despicable topographic point, if it were

cleaned and fed and comforted, that would be a good thing, so ; but if it

were done, in that twenty-four hours and hr all the prosperity and beauty and delectation of

Omelas would shrivel and be destroyed. & # 8221 ;

( Leguin, p. 259 )

When looking at 3rd universe states where illness, malnutrition, disregard and maltreatment are exposed all over, there are many people who feel commiseration, unluckily there is really small action taken to alter this. The writer uses the kid in the narrative to typify the other kids in the universe who are mistreated every bit dreadfully as the kid, based on person else & # 8217 ; s disbursal.

Furthermore, there is a strong message given to the readers. Although, the writer seems as though she is moralising, the readers are non being lectured to. The reader is given the milieus of the kid, and what the kid is subjected to, and are given a pick: accept this intervention of the kid, or walk off. ( Le Guin, p. 260 ) However, the writer besides wants the reader to see the sarcasm of the state of affairs where the kid is necessary to the society, because the writer is seeking to state the reader that everyone needs something against which to compare their being. One is able to cognize how good off they are in their state after doing the comparing of the lives of people in other states. Equally foolish as it sounds, the writer is seeking to relay the message, without others as a footing of comparing, how does one step felicity?

In decision, it is because of this symbolic kid that Le Guin has been able to pull in the reader emotionally, every bit good as make the reader aware of the issues go oning in our society today. The writer has besides been able to efficaciously convey the message to the reader, the great unfortunate it is that in order for one to recognize his/her approvals, they must compare it with those of the less fortunate.

37c