The nutrient supply of the Unites States is safe from taint. This is apparent through the regular surveillance and other attempts done by the governments to maintain the safety of the nation’s nutrient supply particularly from taint. The safety of the nutrient supplies starts at the farm and non in the food market shops.

Harmonizing to the article of Sharon Durham in Agricultural Research entitled Food safety in the twenty-first century: Coordinated Monitoring of Animal Health. in the twelvemonth 2003. the Agricultural Research Service or ARS every bit good as two other bureaus under the US Department of Agriculture or USDA started a combined attempt in protecting the wellness of the farm animal of America every bit good as guaranting the safety of the nutrient supply ( Durham. 1 ) . This research gives manner of following the critical diseases in nutrient production that involves animate beings.

In add-on. it improves general apprehension of factors that causes nutrient safety hazards such as those in workss and other fabrication workss. Besides. scientific scrutinies help observe taint at critical points in nutrient production ( Apgar. 1 ) . On the other manus. the National Animal Health Monitoring System or NAHMS performs surveillance that seeks to place every bit good as tackle carnal wellness and nutrient safety affairs of major concern. Besides. the US Customs and Border Protection or CBP and the Food and Drug Administration or FDA initiated new joint attempts in protecting the nutrient supply of the state.

Through the Memorandum of Understanding or MOU signed last December 2003. the Customss agents are now allowed to analyze nutrients that are imported to the United States ( FDA Consumer. 1 ) . Furthermore. the CBP and FDA issued a policy usher that tells their scheme in keeping the uninterrupted flow of nutrient imports while increasing their safety. The policy usher trades with implementing two ordinances. These are foremost. it require an progress notice to the FDA for cargos of imported nutrients into the state.

Second. it requires a enrollment with the FDA of local every bit good as abroad installations such as fabrication. processing. wadding and retention services for ingestion in the United States. These regulations aim to hike the security in the supply concatenation yet it besides involves extra cost and trouble to transporters ( Albright. 1 ) . Meanwhile. the authorities seeks to heighten criterions for industries to acquire excess money for bigger scrutiny to better the security of authorities comfortss.

National bureaus such as Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) . US Department of Agriculture ( USDA ) . Department of Defense ( DOD ) . Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) . Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) and Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) are working together on bio-security program. In add-on. the EPA makes certain the safety of the H2O supply even from the terrorist onslaughts. The bureau together with local H2O public-service corporations performs rating of susceptiblenesss. to stiffen security within the locality of the installations. to better exigency response programs whenever onslaughts occur ( Chapman. 1 ) .

Anyhow. the nutrient industry has been working smartly besides in guaranting the safety of the nutrient supplies. There are several associations that participated in the Alliance for Food Security. They conduct meetings together with authorities bureaus directing nutrient security concern. The industry is sharing methods that a batch of companies are acquiring to better their security. to full background cheques on employees particularly the new 1s. and to restrict the employees who have entree to chief zone of the installations. Some members of the industry have worked strongly with the aforementioned authorities bureaus to turn to questions refering nutrient.

The FDA has the direct liability for vouching the safety of the nutrient merchandises while CDC leads in carry oning disease surveillance. They keep an oculus on the happening of illness in the US that is attributable to the supply of nutrient. Furthermore. plans such as the one-year Food Safety Summit and Expo that is sponsored by National Food Processors Association and the National Restaurant Association help the fasten the security of the full nation’s nutrient web. Schemes to forestall knowing every bit good as unwilled nutrient taint are being laid out during this one-year activity ( Prewitt. 1 ) .

The nutrient industry. itself. has its ain plans in maintaining the safety of the nutrient supply and this Idaho done in cooperation with the different companies. For case is the Supplier Audits for Food Excellence or SAFE Program which is initiated through the aid of more than two-dozen member companies ( Johnston. 1 ) . Further. the technological promotions today are a large aid when it comes to guaranting the safety of the country’s nutrient supply. The booming field of familial technology has started altering the day-to-day American diet.

Biotechnology has provided us with advancement like nutrients with improved nutritionary content and this clip. FDA is commanding new nutrient merchandises to guarantee their safety.

Mentions:

Durham Sharon. “Food safety in the twenty-first century: co-ordinated monitoring of carnal health” . Agricultural Research. October 2006. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m3741/is_10_54/ai_n16807530. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m3741/is_10_54/ai_n16807530/pg_2. March 2. 2007. “Agencies team up to protect nutrient supply – U. S. Customs and Border Protection” . FDA Consumer. March-April 2004.

Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_2_38/ai_114242021. March 2. 2007. Albright. Brian. “New cargo security ordinances: present challenges to shippers. bearers: progress manifest and nutrient safety regulations could increase safety—and cost—of cross-border cargos – Supply Chain Management” . Frontline Solutions. February 2004. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m0DIS/is_2_5/ai_113907155. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m0DIS/is_2_5/ai_113907155/pg_2. March 2. 2007. Chapman. Nancy. “Industry secures nutrient supply” . Prepared Foods. January 2002.

Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m3289/is_1_171/ai_81861689. March 2. 2007. Apgar. Toni. “A call to action-food toxic condition and nutrient supply safety” . Vegetarian Times. November 1996. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m0820/is_n231/ai_18810447. March 2. 2007. Prewitt. Mildred. “Safety acme: Procuring U. S. nutrient supply an acclivitous conflict ; Contamination and bioterror hot subjects – Food Safety Summit and Expo – Legal Beat” . Nation’s Restaurant News. March 25. 2002. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m3190/is_12_36/ai_84237780. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.

findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m3190/is_12_36/ai_84237780/pg_2. March 2. 2007. Johnston. Kelly. “Safety with a good underside line – Formulation & A ; Ingredient Challenges – Food safety” . Prepared Foods. March 2002. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m3289/is_3_171/ai_83744775. March 2. 2007 Young. Frank E. “Safety foremost: protecting America’s nutrient supply – FDA’s Year of Foods” . FDA Consumer. July-August 1988. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_n6_v22/ai_6589510. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_n6_v22/ai_6589510/pg_2. March 2. 2007