U.S. Patriotism: A Link To American Hatred. Politicss In The Media Essay, Research Paper

As Americans, we believe that universe events over the following few old ages will blossom from September 11th. The safety and security that we all felt before will ne’er be the same. While Americans continue to retrieve our enemies continue to be after a manner to convey us to our articulatio genuss one time once more. Many of us will ne’er once more be able to wing without a fright of what if and many of us will ne’er once more be able to turn on the forenoon intelligence without the fright of what if. We tend to hold the attitude that terrorist onslaughts are events that happen in other states like Israel where peace is unsteady. Many of us ne’er dreamed of holding it in our ain forepart pace and to intensify those affects by seeing parts of the universe celebrating at the sight of a ace power falling to its articulatio genuss.

While the onslaughts themselves are a focal point for many bookmans, I will concentrate non on the onslaughts, but instead I will inquire inquiries as to why the onslaughts happened and why it hurt so much to see others smile merrily at the sight of our hurting. Americans are shocked to see that others would of all time wish us trouble. Much of this is taught to us at an early age, that everyone wants to be American and that the? American Dream? is the lone manner to populate a full and happy life.

What function does the media play in go oning this naivet? of American society and how does the media in other states account for our hurting? How does our ace power outlook drama in this image and why do many citizens of the universe feel ailment will towards Americans? I will turn to these inquiries by reexamining foreign newscasts and magazine articles, questioning international political relations experts, and eventually questioning an expert in American foreign policy. As citizens in a democracy we deserve the truth. The truth about how our authorities treats citizens of other states and other histories of how bad U.S. Foreign Policy creates negative feelings towards American citizens themselves.

To understand how the American media plays into a bigger image of the foreign media it is of import to understand how they both operate. In The Politicss of Illusions by Lance Bennett he writes about noteworthy media differences. Spear writes:

A absorbing illustration of how these work modus operandis affect intelligence content was discovered by Timothy Cook in a survey of Gulf crisis coverage in the United States and France. Immediately following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, telecasting webs assigned their newsmans to acquire reactions from cardinal beginnings. American newscasts flipped through the? aureate trigon? of Washington intelligence beats: the White House, State Department, and Pentagon. Since the invasion had merely occurred, there was no official reaction to be had. However, the newsmans were pressured to state something, and they efficaciously invented the sorts of obscure dictums that one might anticipate from functionaries in sensitive political stations at the early phase of universe crisis. By contrast, Gallic newsmans ( who do non run on U.S.-style round system ) interviewed assorted political party leaders and generated a relatively wide scope of political positions about the significances and deductions of the invasion. ( Bennett 119 )

To understand that most U.S. newsmans non merely have lost sight of existent news media is to besides recognize that those same newsmans sometimes wittingly conceal the truth beneath many ballads of non-important information.

The newsman and political functionary relationship is set to run off one another. The political relations could ne’er play out without the newsmans but on that same side the political relations could ne’er play out without a newsman willing to describe what the political functionary wants to be heard. A politician? s public destiny frequently lies in the trustiness of a newsman. Lance negotiations about how delicate this relationship is by saying, ? When those beginnings are powerful functionaries surrounded by an cortege of eager newsmans clamouring for intelligence, it is ever possible that those who report what functionaries want them to will be rewarded while those who fail to change over cardinal political messages into intelligence will be punished. ? ( Bennett 120 )

Foreign policy encompasses more than war and peace, it besides has to undertake economic jobs and globalism issues, foreign trade, international investing, and foreign assistance are all an built-in portion of this system. In concurrence with NATO and the United Nations, most of American foreign policy is now focused on peacekeeping. And many arguments over foreign and national security issues continue to be drawn along left-right lines. But who draws these lines and who is truly in charge of American foreign policy, the President or the imperativeness?

The media plays a important function in the preparation of U.S. foreign policy. While the President is frequently the leader externally of foreign policy, he realizes he is a co-equal spouse with the media, and this is indispensable to guarantee that policy will win. If the media disfavors policy adopted by the President it limits its success and besides limits the support given to the President by the American people.

Public argument on the national involvement and ends of foreign policy is critical if practical and logical policy is to be formulated. Unfortunately, most of the clip this argument does non look on the intelligence unless it is straight conducted from politicians themselves. While the imperativeness does cover narratives and give some item they can non really take part in the arguments most of the clip. This makes peculiar sense for those newsmans assigned to the executive subdivision because of the calling hazards in straight opposing presidential purposes. ( Berry 145 )

To associate the media straight to our instance survey we should look at a specific illustration being broadcast from the Middle East. Most Americans receive their intelligence from in private owned telecasting Stationss while in the Middle East about all telecasting station there are authorities owned and regulated. So the people hear what the authorities wants them to hear. Since September 11th American? s see a batch of describing coming from a station called Al-Jazeera. Al-Jazeera is the exclusion to the regulation. It is broadcast out of Qatar, in the Persian Gulf. The station is targeted to its Arab neighbours and Arab talkers around the universe, including the United States. Al-Jazeera makes certain that the Arab position is heard, but it besides reports intelligence that is unwelcome to Arab authoritiess. As New York Times reporter John Kifner wrote, ? In a portion of the universe where intelligence has ever been the intelligence the authorities wants, true or non, Al-Jazeera is genuinely a phenomenon. ? ( Kifner B7 )

Now that we have a brief debut as to how the media operates in general pertaining to policy and the authorities, it is of import to look at why these other states sometimes express hatred towards the U.S. While hatred coming from anyone can ever cover a wide scope, in its simplest signifier, hatred towards America tends to cover two countries, bad American Foreign Policy and jealousy towards American? s. Again, while everyone has many thoughts of which foreign policy and American life style create choler, we will seek to concentrate on more concentrated countries. Most foreign policy issues come from jobs in the Middle East and most lifestyle issues are wide runing but by and large targeted towards specific freedoms and rights we have versus their fatherland. Be cognizant that non all Middle Easterner? s hatred America? s foreign policy that other states do every bit good ; we will merely utilize that country as a part to concentrate the survey on. Besides non all foreign citizens enviousness America, so my purpose is non to connote that they do, but research has shown that many citizens of the universe would wish to populate in the U.S.

Has the United States become so big and so powerful that we forget that the remainder of the universe has to populate with us and non around us? For many American? s and most of the universe, anti-Americanism came to a caput on September 11th 2001 when terrorists flew two planes into the World Trade Center? s in New York City, when terrorists flew a plane into the states defence central office, the Pentagon, and when terrorists caused a plane to crash in the Pennsylvania countryside. American? s unrecorded life in a manner that we do non see that others in the universe may see something that we do every bit negative because of the influence that it has on their spiritual beliefs, cultural heritage, or economic battles. Precisely a month after September 11th Kenneth Zapp, Economics professor from Metropolitan State University in Minneapolis wrote, ? Unfortunately, Americans are celebrated for presuming that others see the universe as we do. ? ( Zapp par. 3 ) Zapp continues, ? While Americans like to believe that our authorities treats all reasonably or every bit, our actions are viewed otherwise abroad. ? ( Zapp par. 4 )

The United States has to transport a big load from other states. Bing considered the universe? s? ace power? carries the duty of being able to protect all involvement every bit and playing large brother, which sometimes means our ain involvement struggle with the involvement of those we are suppose to be helping. An first-class illustration of this trigon is the current struggle in the Middle East between Israel and Palestine. For many old ages the U.S. has protected and supported Israel with big sums of money and arms. Now in times of struggle the universe looks upon us to be a peacekeeper and to repair the job and do it travel off. Is it possible for us to play a impersonal function in a struggle where we have historically supported one side more than the other? Caught in this struggle is besides a certain sum of incrimination placed on the U.S. because we allowed, or at the really least supported Israel and allow this go on. Zapp addressed this state of affairs in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, he wrote? But why do they fault us for actions of Israel? Because our authorities has bankrolled that state? s policies with $ 3 billion to $ 4 billion of assistance each twelvemonth. Most detrimental to our claim of evenhandedness, we continued these subsidies even when the Israeli actions were condemned widely by our Western Alliess and the United Nations. ? ( Zapp par. 6. )

Even in these state of affairss many Americans still do non cognize the truth behind our authoritiess actions. Today anti-Americanism is frequently dismissed as an ineluctable byproduct of superpowerdom or as mere lip service. Many will inquire if these ailments against America warranted the actions of September 11th. While many put it really crudely, none has stated that the Americans of all time deserved it. A hebdomad after the onslaughts the Toronto Star published an column from

the documents own editor emeritus, Haroon Siddiqui. Siddiqui wrote, ? The populace, more than the media, senses this. Some put it clearly: America had it coming. The surprise is how a wide spectrum of the Canadian middle category, including faculty members, professionals and concern people, is coming to the position that America needs, beyond any tactical work stoppages or smart bombs it might deploy, a more humanist and even-handed attack to the world. ? ( Siddiqui par. 32 ) Many terrorists do desire to fire the U.S. and are willing to decease for their beliefs. These self-destructive anti-Americans will ne’er be persuaded to alter their heads. ( Naim par. 15 )

Current and past U.S. foreign policy has yielded different consequences. During my college life I have been shocked and horrified by U.S. governmental actions, such as the U.S. sponsored putsch against democracy in Guatemala in 1954 which resulted in killing over 120,000 Guatemala citizens to protect the involvement of the United Fruit Company, an American corporation. ( Schlesinger 32 ) I besides remember the U.S. war against the people of El Salvador in the 1980? s when I was immature, which resulted in deceases of more than 80,000 people which the authorities considered to be? indirect damage. ? The U.S. authorities defines? indirect harm? as being guiltless people who are merely casualties of war, or besides considered? soft marks. ?

Both of these illustrations are extraordinary, because besides the random professor who may learn this information, it is non easy found. The U.S. media ne’er reported the information in mainstream day-to-day newspapers and are still considered to be forbidden topics among the media. For the dedicated research worker you can scuffle through 1000s of pages of congressional studies and white house documents and happen the information, if you are willing to delve, in unfindable topographic points. Why do the media and the U.S. authorities travel to such extremes to conceal this information from us? Am I incorrect when I say that I thought our authorities was supposed to back up our involvement?

As a state that has been a universe leader in giving its citizens freedom and human and civil rights, we are expected to put an illustration for the remainder of the universe. I do non believe that the illustration we want to put is, ? If you agree with them back up them, if non take all necessary action to coerce their support or change. ? Equally long as we continue to bomb states because they disagree with us and go on to back up states that kill 1000s of guiltless citizens for selfish addition, the U.S. will ever be blamed for helping these actions. ? Equally long as this is their world, we will be their enemy. ? ( Zapp par. 12 )

For all the hurting the U.S. heaps upon the universe with our foreign policy determinations, it seems that we create a dream for merely as many people who are non sing the negative affects of our policy. This dream is frequently referred to as the? American dream. ? From a really early age, get downing in simple school and on up we are taught that the? American dream? is the lone manner to populate and that the remainder of the universe strives to populate the? American dream. ? Bing an grownup now, I realize that those ideas carry many falsities, arising with my school teachers and stoping today with the American imperativeness who teaches the same thoughts. For Americans, if the remainder of the universe wants to be us and populate an American life, how bad can we genuinely be?

As Americans we appreciate a criterion of life which is much higher than that of most of the remainder of the universe. So to populate the American dream is tantamount to being able to win, be free in your picks, being free in your address, and most of all being able to seek prosperity and felicity in everything around you. Dr. John Lewis from Ashland University feels that terrorist? s hate of the West is non based on green-eyed monster, but based on good. Lewis writes, ? The moral, political, economic, and spiritual support necessary for these onslaughts have been provided over the past 25 old ages by specific authoritiess in the Middle East. Those authoritiess wish to destruct the Great Satan: America, her nucleus values, and the prosperity that has followed from our chase of those values. ? ( Lewis par. 4 ) Herein lies the job ; does everyone in the universe genuinely wish to be American?

At the harmless terminal of the spectrum is the enviousness brought on by the United States pre-eminent wealth and might. Anyone who has been king of the hill for really long will happen others heartening his occasional stumble or seeking to strike hard him off outright. Arrogance, existent or fanciful, adds burning to emotion. Traveling further along this spectrum, bitterness evolves into fright. Renowned lawyer Chi-Dooh Li writes, ? Herein besides lies a great paradox. Ask people anyplace in the universe, including the Arab universe, where they would populate, given the pick, and the overpowering figure would call America. ? ( Li par. 27 ) No affair how much detest one may possess towards the United States they still see clearly how different their life can be here.

While there is really small inquiry as to the illustriousness that America offers its citizens and 1000s of immigrants who move here each twelvemonth, there is inquiry as to how we treat other states. We lead by illustration for other great states. At this point in history we have really good relationships with other of import states such as Russia, England, and Israel, but one time those good relationships end where does that go forth America. Our policy continues to work and boom around the universe because other? ace power babe? s? let it to run. Would we be so successful in our peacekeeping or war combat if other states did non back up us? The old expression, ? what? s good for the goose is good for the gander, ? comes to mind when I think about the state of affairs we are now. One twenty-four hours America will non be top Canis familiaris and one twenty-four hours person will coerce us to populate in the conditions that we have heaped upon the universe, but will we be prepared?

As Americans continue to populate their lives in a happy small shock, the universe continues to plot how to convey us to our articulatio genuss one time once more. We live our lives in a manner that allow us to worry about ourselves and nil else. We allow our authorities to take attention of concern the manner they see fit. We besides allow the media to educate us in a manner they see fit. American? s as a general regulation take no active function in educating themselves in political relations. The job is that one-day, Americans themselves will be accountable for the authorities? s actions, and we will hold no hint as to what we did incorrectly. Seeking to repair the jobs now is the lone solution to guard off farther jobs in the hereafter. Everyone in the universe is non traveling to love us all of the clip, but if we can at least win over portion of the universe some of the clip, things will go on to acquire better.

While apathy will most likely ever exist in America, particularly where political relations and authorities are concerned, there are a few ways to look at how the media is non wholly responsible for American ignorance. Lance Bennett tries to explicate how both sides can be together, he writes,

In the ideal civics book version of American democracy, power remainders with the people, who are, in consequence, the voice of the political system. Leaderships are supposed to take cues from the people and show their voice politically. The journalist in this strategy occupies the function of the independent proctor who reports to the people on how well leaders handle the public trust. ( Bennett 195 )

Citizens can go an effectual portion of this by believing how they receive the information and how the media and the politicians can present it more efficaciously. Besides seeking to calculate out a manner to do the current system work, citizens would besides behove themselves to assist make a better national communicating system. The media is non traveling to make all the political engagement for the populace ; everyone must make his or her ain portion. Bennett discusses this quiet clearly by stating, ? In short, it can do a large difference to people if they realize that going better informed does non merely intend reading more documents or watching more telecasting. It means decrypting the information from these and other beginnings with a critical eye. ? ( Bennett 201 )

Works CitedBennett, Lance. News: The Politicss of Illusion. White Plains: Longman Publishers, 1996

Berry, Nicholas. Foreign Policy and the Press. New York: Greenwood Press, 1990.

Bidstrup, Scott? Why Do They Hate Us So Much? America? s New Problem With Terrorism? 12/30/2001. Paragraph 74. 07/04/2002 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bidstrup.com/hate.htmBuell, John? Terrorizing the Fundamental law? Common Dreams News Center, 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.commondreams.org/views01/1117-07.htmChomsky, Noam. ? September 11th and Its Aftermath: Where is the World Heading? ? Music Academy. Chennai Madras, India. 10 Nov. 2001.

Dorman, William. The U.S. Press and Iran: Foreign Policy and the Journalism of Deference. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.

Isikoff, Michael, and Daniel Klaidman. ? The Hijackers We Let Escape. ? Newsweek 10 June 2002

? It? s The U.S. Foreign Policy, Stupid. ? Editorial. The Toronto Star [ Toronto, Ontario ] 19 Sept. 2001

Kaplan, Richard. Politicss and the American Imperativeness: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865? 1920.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Kifner, John. ? At Arab All-News Channel, Western Values Prevail. ? New York Times 12 October 2001, sec. Bacillus: 7.

Lewis, John. ? Hatred of Western Civilization: Why Terrorists Attacked America. ?

Ashland University. Ashland, 12 Sept. 2001.

Li, Chi-Dooh. ? Why Do They a. ) Hate, B. ) Fear, c. ) Envy, d. ) Resent US? ? Seattle Post-Intelligencer 21 Oct. 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.commondreams.org/views01/1021-12.htmMoises, Naim. ? Why the World Loves to Hate America? Foreign Policy Magazine December 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc? pagemane=View & A ; c=Article & A ; cid=FT3FIPEYWUC & A ; live=trueRogge, Malcolm. ? Rule of Force v. Rule of Law: The Global Lock-down on Civil Liberties. ? Canadian Dimension Magazine December 2001: 60-66.

Schlesinger, Stephen. Bitter Fruit: The Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala. New York: Anchor Books, 1990.

Williams, Patricia. ? This Dangerous Patriot? s Game. ? Observer of London 2 Dec. 2001

The World is Watching. Director Peter Raymont. With Elizabeth Gray. First Run / Incarus Films, 1988.

Zapp, Kenneth. ? The Naivet? in Asking? Why Do They Hate Us So Much? ? ?

Minneapolis Star Tribune 13 Oct. 2001 hypertext transfer protocol: //www.commondreams.org/views01/1013-01.htm