World View Of Bertrand Russell Essay, Research Paper
The World View of Bertrand Russell
In today & # 8217 ; s universe, it is hard to cognize merely what is right among the thoughts of the existence, what we are and how we came to be, and how we should populate as human existences and as a society. Bertrand Russell, an agnostic philosopher, approaches these inquiries and attempts to reply them harmonizing to what scientific discipline has proven throughout history.
In an argument with F. C. Copleston, Bertrand Russell was questioned on the being of God. Russell states that his position is agnostic ( 123 ) , intending he is impersonal. He doesn & # 8217 ; Ts say that he is for faith nor does he state that he is against faith. He merely believes scientific discipline must turn out there is a God ( 129 ) . Copleston adds that one should look for the being of God and stating non to is dogmatic ( 129 ) . Copleston so inquiries Russell & # 8217 ; s position of the existence. Bertrand Russell replies that & # 8220 ; The word & # 8220 ; universe & # 8221 ; is a ready to hand word in some connexions, but I don & # 8217 ; t believe it stands for anything that has significance ( 129 ) . & # 8221 ; He so goes on to province that & # 8220 ; The existence is merely at that place, and that is all ( 131 ) . & # 8221 ;
In another argument with F. C. Copleston, Bertrand Russell is questioned on the topic of ethical motives. Russell believes to understand if a adult male & # 8217 ; s ethical motives are to be a mark of believing in God that must be proven ( 138 ) . He believes that separating between good and bad are like seeing the difference in bluish and xanthous. You distinguish by looking at colourss but you distinguish good and bad by feelings ( 139 ) . Peoples can do errors in that as they can in other things. Moral duty, from Russell & # 8217 ; s position is that & # 8220 ; One has to take history of the effects, and I think right behavior is that which would likely bring forth the greatest possible balance in intrinsic value of all the Acts of the Apostless possible in the fortunes, and you & # 8217 ; ve got to take history of the likely effects of your action in sing what is right ( 140 ) . & # 8221 ; He is explicating that for every action there is a reaction. He believes we should populate as worlds how we are taught or governed. He believes that conditioned physiological reactions state us what we should make and what we shouldn & # 8217 ; T.
The organic structure of a adult male is, from Russell & # 8217 ; s point of position, a combination of events ( 147 ) . These events are clustered into groups. Events that happen in our head are considered thought while those that go on outside the head are considered insouciant events. Mind and organic structure are merely convenient ways of forming events. Of the head is memory. The memory is thought to last after decease, nevertheless, the portion of the encephalon that decays at decease ceases to be significance that the memory would besides. He believes that the philistinism oppositions are right in their desires to turn out that the head is immoral and that the ultimate power is mental instead so physical ( 149 ) .
Russell believes each of us have a different scruples. With this, we all have differing positions of what is right and what is incorrect. Our witting can non be relied on to find what is right. We should populate on what we believe such as faith, values, and ethical motives. However, scruples is a merchandise of instruction, and it can be trained to O.K. or disapprove as pedagogues see fit ( 227 ) . It is a proved fact that if we act through desires of intelligence, felicity, and freedom of fright, work forces can be brought to move more than they do at the present in a mode that is consistent with the general felicity of world ( 242-3 ) . He considers the good life one that is inspired by love and felicity ( 372 ) . We should populate as a society where free competition is in thoughts non economic sciences ( 56 ) and justness is the agreement of bring forthing the least enviousness ( 55 ) . Russell states that Miss McMillan is developing kids to make a free community. If this could go on, it would work out our societal jobs. Yet we must learn kids to populate and allow unrecorded from birth. He so goes on to province that & # 8220 ; Given work forces and adult females who do non want the things which can merely be secured through the bad lucks of others, the obstructions to societal freedom will be at an terminal. ( 56 ) . & # 8221 ;
In my sentiment, Bertrand Russell & # 8217 ; s cardinal statements are really strong about the existence, his construct off worlds, and how we should populate. He makes distinguishable illustrations of why we should turn to science to reply inquiries affecting God and faith, our psyche and head, and how we should move in society. If we were to oppugn everything and pursue cognition to the extent of going wise we could larn to acquire along better with each other in society. Russell states & # 8220 ; Intellectual soberness, hence, will take up to size up our beliefs closely, with a position to detecting which of them there is any ground to believe is true ( 6 ) . I agree to an extent with Russell & # 8217 ; s point of position about God and faith. I believe faith is a manner for people to soothe themselves. Peoples fear decease and a manner for them to be at easiness is stating decease is merely the terminal of the physical and the psyche will populate on. Russell says that the memory-mind are apart of the encephalon that ceases to be after decease. If one ceases to be so the other would besides ( 23 ) . He so goes on to state that & # 8220 ; It is non rational statements but emotions that cause a belief in a future life ( 26 ) . & # 8221 ; I besides agree with Russell about values and ethical motives are different to everyone. We all have different penchants. This penchant is a affair of gustatory sensation. One adult male may wish apples while another prefers bananas. Everything revolves around gustatory sensation. I disagree with Bertrand Russell that God has to be proven to be. I believe there is a God, nevertheless, I am non convinced that Christianity is wholly right. I believe something had to make us and that something is an omniscient being. I besides believe that there is a program for all of us. We all do things for a ground. We may non cognize the ground at the minute but in the terminal we understand why it happened.
I believe from reading and discoursing Bertrand Russell & # 8217 ; s universe position that I have slightly formulated my ain position. I would non name myself a Christian but I do believe in God. I would besides province that felicity is the key to populating a good life and love is a emotion we all need to give and have. Russell helped me to germinate my ain thoughts into something I can volitionally portion with others. I know we all will hold different thoughts of what is God and how we approach repose. I besides can province that I have learned from Russell & # 8217 ; s doctrine that taking a scientific attack to any state of affairs can break my apprehension and broaden my position. Russell states that & # 8220 ; The chase of doctrine is founded on the belief that cognition is good, even if what is known is painful ( 6 ) . & # 8221 ;
I was left with inquiries after discoursing and reading approximately Russell & # 8217 ; s universe position. He leaves me oppugning Christianity and scientific discipline. I believe that he does this due to how we can merely turn out certain things. I feel I must oppugn everything and from this I will be able to derive cognition.
Erbium
ica L. Tabor
Intro to Philosophy
9-12-99
The World View of Bertrand Russell
In today & # 8217 ; s universe, it is hard to cognize merely what is right among the thoughts of the existence, what we are and how we came to be, and how we should populate as human existences and as a society. Bertrand Russell, an agnostic philosopher, approaches these inquiries and attempts to reply them harmonizing to what scientific discipline has proven throughout history.
In an argument with F. C. Copleston, Bertrand Russell was questioned on the being of God. Russell states that his position is agnostic ( 123 ) , intending he is impersonal. He doesn & # 8217 ; Ts say that he is for faith nor does he state that he is against faith. He merely believes scientific discipline must turn out there is a God ( 129 ) . Copleston adds that one should look for the being of God and stating non to is dogmatic ( 129 ) . Copleston so inquiries Russell & # 8217 ; s position of the existence. Bertrand Russell replies that & # 8220 ; The word & # 8220 ; universe & # 8221 ; is a ready to hand word in some connexions, but I don & # 8217 ; t believe it stands for anything that has significance ( 129 ) . & # 8221 ; He so goes on to province that & # 8220 ; The existence is merely at that place, and that is all ( 131 ) . & # 8221 ;
In another argument with F. C. Copleston, Bertrand Russell is questioned on the topic of ethical motives. Russell believes to understand if a adult male & # 8217 ; s ethical motives are to be a mark of believing in God that must be proven ( 138 ) . He believes that separating between good and bad are like seeing the difference in bluish and xanthous. You distinguish by looking at colourss but you distinguish good and bad by feelings ( 139 ) . Peoples can do errors in that as they can in other things. Moral duty, from Russell & # 8217 ; s position is that & # 8220 ; One has to take history of the effects, and I think right behavior is that which would likely bring forth the greatest possible balance in intrinsic value of all the Acts of the Apostless possible in the fortunes, and you & # 8217 ; ve got to take history of the likely effects of your action in sing what is right ( 140 ) . & # 8221 ; He is explicating that for every action there is a reaction. He believes we should populate as worlds how we are taught or governed. He believes that conditioned physiological reactions state us what we should make and what we shouldn & # 8217 ; T.
The organic structure of a adult male is, from Russell & # 8217 ; s point of position, a combination of events ( 147 ) . These events are clustered into groups. Events that happen in our head are considered thought while those that go on outside the head are considered insouciant events. Mind and organic structure are merely convenient ways of forming events. Of the head is memory. The memory is thought to last after decease, nevertheless, the portion of the encephalon that decays at decease ceases to be significance that the memory would besides. He believes that the philistinism oppositions are right in their desires to turn out that the head is immoral and that the ultimate power is mental instead so physical ( 149 ) .
Russell believes each of us have a different scruples. With this, we all have differing positions of what is right and what is incorrect. Our witting can non be relied on to find what is right. We should populate on what we believe such as faith, values, and ethical motives. However, scruples is a merchandise of instruction, and it can be trained to O.K. or disapprove as pedagogues see fit ( 227 ) . It is a proved fact that if we act through desires of intelligence, felicity, and freedom of fright, work forces can be brought to move more than they do at the present in a mode that is consistent with the general felicity of world ( 242-3 ) . He considers the good life one that is inspired by love and felicity ( 372 ) . We should populate as a society where free competition is in thoughts non economic sciences ( 56 ) and justness is the agreement of bring forthing the least enviousness ( 55 ) . Russell states that Miss McMillan is developing kids to make a free community. If this could go on, it would work out our societal jobs. Yet we must learn kids to populate and allow unrecorded from birth. He so goes on to province that & # 8220 ; Given work forces and adult females who do non want the things which can merely be secured through the bad lucks of others, the obstructions to societal freedom will be at an terminal. ( 56 ) . & # 8221 ;
In my sentiment, Bertrand Russell & # 8217 ; s cardinal statements are really strong about the existence, his construct off worlds, and how we should populate. He makes distinguishable illustrations of why we should turn to science to reply inquiries affecting God and faith, our psyche and head, and how we should move in society. If we were to oppugn everything and pursue cognition to the extent of going wise we could larn to acquire along better with each other in society. Russell states & # 8220 ; Intellectual soberness, hence, will take up to size up our beliefs closely, with a position to detecting which of them there is any ground to believe is true ( 6 ) . I agree to an extent with Russell & # 8217 ; s point of position about God and faith. I believe faith is a manner for people to soothe themselves. Peoples fear decease and a manner for them to be at easiness is stating decease is merely the terminal of the physical and the psyche will populate on. Russell says that the memory-mind are apart of the encephalon that ceases to be after decease. If one ceases to be so the other would besides ( 23 ) . He so goes on to state that & # 8220 ; It is non rational statements but emotions that cause a belief in a future life ( 26 ) . & # 8221 ; I besides agree with Russell about values and ethical motives are different to everyone. We all have different penchants. This penchant is a affair of gustatory sensation. One adult male may wish apples while another prefers bananas. Everything revolves around gustatory sensation. I disagree with Bertrand Russell that God has to be proven to be. I believe there is a God, nevertheless, I am non convinced that Christianity is wholly right. I believe something had to make us and that something is an omniscient being. I besides believe that there is a program for all of us. We all do things for a ground. We may non cognize the ground at the minute but in the terminal we understand why it happened.
I believe from reading and discoursing Bertrand Russell & # 8217 ; s universe position that I have slightly formulated my ain position. I would non name myself a Christian but I do believe in God. I would besides province that felicity is the key to populating a good life and love is a emotion we all need to give and have. Russell helped me to germinate my ain thoughts into something I can volitionally portion with others. I know we all will hold different thoughts of what is God and how we approach repose. I besides can province that I have learned from Russell & # 8217 ; s doctrine that taking a scientific attack to any state of affairs can break my apprehension and broaden my position. Russell states that & # 8220 ; The chase of doctrine is founded on the belief that cognition is good, even if what is known is painful ( 6 ) . & # 8221 ;
I was left with inquiries after discoursing and reading approximately Russell & # 8217 ; s universe position. He leaves me oppugning Christianity and scientific discipline. I believe that he does this due to how we can merely turn out certain things. I feel I must oppugn everything and from this I will be able to derive cognition.
