Decision Making And War Aims Essay, Research Paper
?
Did Roman determination
doing have inner logic and consistence? ?
Purposes alteration and are
varied, we do non hold adequate information to dissect these purposes right. ?
Principate following
form emerges? Tribe raids Roman Territory? Emperor decides to travel to war,
lickings Tribe, folk incorporate into imperium or not. ? Were there bust? Or Emperor demoing off? ? Did he trust to spread out, or merely an after
thought? ?
Commanding officers merely went
to war? that? s why there was a jurisprudence to halt unauthorized wars 0 a lex
Iulia. ? First brush Teutones?
consequences from an motiveless onslaught beyond Alps 0 neglect for alleged defensive
value of natural frontiers. ?
Emperor decides to travel
to war, non elected by people, he relies on standing ground forces for support? organic structure
affected by decision. ? Yes frontier
people may profit from security, but no merriment holding army through the town. ? War non truly helpful to capital universe or
civilian population. ?
War beneficial to
soldiers nevertheless? loot and loot, devastation? Corbulo? exhorted his
soliders to procure both glorification and spoil? ?
Suppression of
internal agitation profitable every bit good 0 loot Alexandria 215? valiant soldier promoted. ?
Great chance of
societal and material addition?
Dio shows importance
of fiscal addition?
Standing ground forces
inducement to contend and political will to utilize such an disbursal? military glorification
enhances the repute of an emperor? strengthen ties with military personnels?
No officer category
invariably seting force per unit area on imperium like modern military absolutisms, but
ground forces put people in, merely a commanding officer of a friend. ? Rank and file had really small to make with it. ? Emperor was dependent on the ground forces?
respected by soldier and opinion categories if an effectual warrior? ground forces ever a
menace to governing category. ?
Annexation profitable
if achieved without war? appropriation Iceni? land was plundered by
centurions, the royal house by slaves as if they had been captured in war? ?
Roman citizens did
peculiarly good in new extensions? jurisprudence etc. ?
Two groups benefit
from war are military and the Romans occupant among the capable population. ?
No indicant played
any function in explicating policy? instruments of appropriation and gained by it. ?
No involvement group
proposing war? imperial will, evidently needed soldiers enthusiasm, but
Emperor made determination with helpful advice. ?
Advisor anything from
household and friends, senators to boorish upstarts. ? No anteroom groups persistent? fortune of the draw. ?
Conflict between
imperial advisors chiefly on personal issues and non on policy of personal businesss of
province. ?
Must non undervalue
desire for military glorification: Severeus simply pretended harmonizing to Dio,
conquered Mesopotamia for benefit of Syria. ?
Real motor military glory. ? Merely
expostulation war from others would be waste of money? no involvement groups.
