ANTONY Essay, Research Paper

ESSAY CONTRASTING SPEECHES OF BRUTUS AND MARK ANTONY

Both Brutus and Mark Antony have two wholly different intents and dockets in each of their addresss to the Roman citizens. Brutus & # 8217 ; purpose is to convert the multitude of restless Romans that Rome has been saved thanks to the gallant plotters for murdering the covetous, power-hungry, Caesar. However, Antony, a loyal friend of Caesar & # 8217 ; s, wants to demo Brutus and the plotters for what they truly are: nil but barbarian liquidators who killed Caesar out of malice and green-eyed monster and non for the good of Rome. By making this, Antony hopes the volatile rabble will turn into a clump of irate rabble-rousers that will settle for nil less than the retaliation and deceases of the plotters.

Brutus & # 8217 ; address is a useless and uneffective from start to complete. Approaching the citizens as intelligent bookmans, when in fact, the rabble consists of nil but nonreader common mans, who can non calculate out for themselves what is right from what is incorrect, was Brutus & # 8217 ; fatal error. Throughout the continuance of the address, Brutus mentions how he loves Caesar and how no 1 has more compunction for the decease of Caesar than himself. After paying testimonial to the marvelous life of Caesar, Brutus explains that he killed him because he loves Rome more than Caesar, and that Caesar had become ambitious. Of class the fleeceable crowd is pleased to hear that Brutus loves Rome. But they can non hold on the construct of being assassinated for aspiration, as Brutus did non state in what manner Caesar was ambitious or why he should be so badly punished. Brutus left a backward moronic rabble all the pieces to set together, but they can non believe for themselves, and hence, can non grok his address. The wake of Brutus & # 8217 ; address is a disconcerted crowd that all have jumped on the “ aspiration bandwagon ” due to a few appealing words of Brutus & # 8217 ; passion for Rome, when in world, they did non understand the significance of the address at all. Using aspiration as his exclusive ground for backstabbing Caesar, possibly individual conveniently, caused the ruin of the Roman Republic. All

Antony had to make now was persuade the rabble that Brutus was incorrect about Caesar’s aspiration, and the rabble would turn against Brutus and the plotters.

In contrast to Brutus & # 8217 ; address, Antony & # 8217 ; s was superb. Even before he began to talk, Antony faced two hard jobs: foremost was the fact that he conducted it under a set of unfavourable land regulations made by Brutus, and the 2nd, that the multitude of citizens was already on Brutus & # 8217 ; side. Immediately, Antony is able to make what Brutus failed to make by linking with the citizens alternatively of speaking above them. Besides the rabble is non confused as Antony speaks of simple constructs such as his friendly relationship to Caesar. By utilizing touchable shared experiences of Caesar & # 8217 ; s deficiency of aspiration, such as the refusal of the Crown at Lupercal, the rabble starts to oppugn whether Caesar was excessively ambitious or non. After oppugning whether all the virtuous things Caesar has done for Rome were ambitious, Antony onslaughts Brutus by partner offing Caesar & # 8217 ; s aspiration with Brutus & # 8217 ; award. This was really clever because it gives the impression to the crowd that if Caesar was in fact non ambitious so Brutus is in fact non an honest adult male. All that is left to make is wipe out the thought of Caesar being excessively ambitious, and that is precisely what he does. Everything Antony does construct a resonance with the rabble. When he weeps openly the rabble can associate to emotion. He besides uses the organic structure of Caesar and talk dramatically about each lesion. The will is another tactic in Antony & # 8217 ; s address as it shows how much Caesar cared for Rome. Once he has the rabble on his side, he makes them believe that mutiny is their ain thought and this is what the rabble eventually does.

These two addresss manifest what a powerful arm linguistic communication is if it is used in the right manner that fits the fortunes. Brutus & # 8217 ; address was a failure because he was unable to pass on on the same degree with his audience. On the other manus, Antony said what the people needed to hear in a clear and distinguishable manner that the crowd could construe for itself. The civil war that was to break out had already been won, non with blades on the battleground, but with pick words from Mark Antony.