Freakonomics Case Essay Sample

Free Articles

Steven D. Levitt is an award winning economic expert. Stephen J. Dubner is an award winning author. The two met in Chicago. and the consequence was Freakonomics. a book that claims to research the concealed side of everything. utilizing real-life illustrations such as surveies and polls conducted by Levitt to explicate how economic sciences is everyplace. that economic science is how the universe truly maps. Through everything from analysing the interior thought procedures of real-estate agents and cleft traders. to foretelling the following popular babe names. Levitt and Dubner guide readers to believe otherwise. ask inquiries. and to utilize “Freakonomics” in their day-to-day lives. Freakonomics is divided into six chapters. each incorporating surveies and narratives that are analyzed economically in order to seek to nail the anchor of the modern twenty-four hours universe. In a nutshell. the first chapter negotiations about rip offing school teachers and sumo grapplers. the 2nd chapter compares the Ku Klux Klan and real-estate agents. the 3rd chapter looks at the income of drug traders. the 4th chapter inspects condemnable behaviour over the past decennaries. the 5th chapter asks the inquiry: “Do parents truly count? ” . and the concluding chapter examines what a baby’s name can uncover about the parents.

Each chapter contains multiple surveies related to the subject of the chapter. their consequences. and how they affect economic sciences and consecutive. the universe. By explicating the surveies. inquiring inquiries of the reader. and believing critically. Levitt and Dubner help the reader think like an economic expert. Levitt and Dubner’s usage of tone is an of import facet in Freakonomics. as they use it to bind together their surveies and use them to existent life. Their tone could foremost be described as informational and statistical. The bulk of Levitt’s surveies rely to a great extent on statistics to turn out his point. including studies and nose counts. that call for more critical and academic linguistic communication. As the writers examine the effects of legalized abortions on America. they tell us that “There are approximately 1. 5 million abortions in the United States every twelvemonth. For a individual who believes that 1 neonate is deserving 100 foetuss. those 1. 5 million abortions would translate-dividing 1. 5 million by 100-into the equivalent of a loss of 15. 000 human lives. Fifteen thousand lives: that happens to be about the same figure of people who die in homicides in the United States every twelvemonth. And it is far more than the figure of homicides eliminated each twelvemonth due to legalized abortion” ( Levitt 144 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Levitt and Dubner’s usage of critical thought and connexion is apparent throughout their geographic expedition of “The concealed side of everything” . and it guides the reader to get down believing the same manner. But possibly the most prevailing tone is the authors’ sense of conversationalism and wit. Levitt and Dubner frequently use slang. including some unconventional authorship manners. and gag with the reader. all while keeping focal point and using the facts to the subject at manus. This normally shows up in little. yet noticeable ways. It is ever evident that the writers are speaking straight to the reader as if there is a conversation traveling on between them. They will frequently state things like: “But let’s consider…” ( 144 ) . Or when showing new information: “Now. here’s what it cost…” ( 101 ) . The most normally used devices in Freakonomics ; nevertheless. are oppugning the reader and the usage of short. emphasized sentences.

When used together. as they sometimes are in this work. Levitt and Dubner can hold a large impact on the reader’s ideas. As they begin to discourse the “antidote to information abuse” . they ask: “So what happened? The Internet happened” ( 66 ) . The epilogue of Freakonomics Begins by stating: “…this book so has no ‘unifying subject. ’ But if there is no consolidative subject to Freakonomics. there is at least a common yarn running through the mundane application of Freakonomics. It has to make with thought sanely about how people behave in the existent world” ( 205 ) . Levitt and Dubner carry through this intent of acquiring the reader to believe sanely about how people behave in the existent universe by animating in the reader a sense of spoting. measurement. and critical thought. They teach the reader to inquire inquiries and to delve deeper into an issue by looking at the “cause and effect” facet of it. They teach the reader to research the concealed side of everything.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out