Observation Of Communication- Essay, Research Paper

Observation of Communication-

Womans are more perceptibly diffident so work forces. Nonverbally, their

& # 8220 ; organic structure linguistic communication & # 8221 ; seems to pass on feelings of great uncertainness and

uneasiness. For illustration, I observed a adult female in a coach en path

to the Cherry Hill Mall. Her and a immature adult male sitting straight across

from her were engaged in what was seemingly a common coquette. But the

adult male seemed much more confident and cocky than did the female. For one

thing, he was unagitated and relaxed. The adult female, nevertheless, kept her weaponries

folded over a bag that she clung to instead tightly. Furthermore, the

female had a strong inclination to look down more frequently than the

male and although her esteem for him was obvious, & # 8211 ; she seemed to

be seeking particularly difficult to hide it.

Further grounds of greater communicative differences exist

between males and females in assorted other societal scenes every bit good.

See, for illustration, those single employed in client

service-related capacities. While in Shoprite, I noticed that female

client service representatives were more disposed to offer instantly

friendly aid than were the male attenders whom I observed on

another juncture. Males are non as cocky nor as confident in this kind

of state of affairs ; their eyes tend to flit around the country while the eyes

of a adult female remain focused upon the eyes of the client. The adult male seems

to pass on with fewer smilings & # 8211 ; seemingly they have to acquire past a

certain & # 8220 ; ice-breaking & # 8221 ; point before they will experience comfy with a

echt expression of felicity.

Verbally, the existent procedure of spee

ch is besides rather different

between males and females. The former normally tends to hold a more

base-orientated voice and a faster rate of address while the latter is

more unagitated and soft-spoken. Work force seem to talk more nasally and adult females

seem to hold a better control over the English linguistic communication. Over the

class of a few yearss, I noticed hearing significantly fewer & # 8220 ; ums & # 8221 ; and

& # 8220 ; errs & # 8221 ; from adult females than I did from work forces. This did non needfully

indicate that they presented themselves more confidently, merely with

greater eloquence. Work forces have a inclination to utilize their custodies more frequently

while talking than make their female opposite numbers. In one observed

case, several work forces and adult females had gathered in a local pizza shop and

the sum of manus gestures and gesture that the cats were utilizing seemed

to be infinite. One cat practically drew out an full image of his

auto in the air while depicting it to the group of friends. Meanwhile,

the misss & # 8217 ; custodies remained on their nutrient or their drink or on the

tabular array. Girls nodded much more than boys & # 8211 ; but made no other gesture

with every bit much frequence.

Finally, it can be inferred from my observations that certain

cultural theoretical accounts causes the witnessed forms of speech production and

communicating. Girls are & # 8220 ; taught & # 8221 ; to be shy an inferior & # 8211 ; and this is

evidenced in their non-verbal demureness while talking in a one-to-one

state of affairss with males. But work forces are taught that over-happiness is

& # 8220 ; queer & # 8221 ; and so smilings are non about every bit common on the male & # 8217 ; s face as

they are on the female & # 8217 ; s face. Both sexes surely seem to bask

speaking & # 8211 ; but each is more comfy in their ain different

scenario.