Wrath Comparison Essay, Research Paper
Of Mice and Men and The Grapes Of Wrath
John Ernst Steinbeck & # 8217 ; s novels The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men portion many common subjects such as dependancy, endurance and integrity. Although subtle, the most challenging nexus between these two novels is Steinbecks infatuation with the human psyche. He delves deep into the human bosom and pulls forth really strong emotions such as devotedness, compassion and understanding. These feelings are what propel Steinbecks novels frontward. It is through the microcosmic relationship of George and Lennie, in Of Mice and Men, and the societal universe of the migrators, in The Grapes of Wrath, that Steinbeck illustrates the limitless reaches one would travel for his fellow adult male once a bond has been formed.
The relationship between George and Lennie shows the limitless reaches one would travel for his fellow adult male on a microcosmis degree Steinbeck uses these two characters to stand for strong one-on-one relationshiips that one experiences throughout their ain personal life. Although George and Lennie are two single work forces, the qualities that one lacked, the other possessed: & # 8220 ; Behind him [ George ] walked his opposite & # 8221 ; ( mice, pg.2 ) . Consequently, over the old ages George and Lennie created such a bond that they completed each other. Through George, Steinbeck represents the forfeits that are made in the best involvement of a loved one. These forfeits presented George with many adversities and defeats throughout his life. & # 8220 ; If I was entirely I could populate so easy. & # 8221 ; ( mice, pg. 11 ) Because Lennie was unable to believe in a logical mode for himself, George gave up his ain dreams and created a individual dream for both himself and Lennie: & # 8220 ; OK, someday we & # 8217 ; re gon na acquire the doodly-squat together and we & # 8217 ; re gon na hold a small house and a twosome of estates an & # 8217 ; a cow and some hogs and we & # 8217 ; ll have a large vegetable spot and a coney hutch and poulets. And when it rains in the winter, we & # 8217 ; ll merely state the snake pit with goin & # 8217 ; to work, and we & # 8217 ; ll construct up a fire in the range and set around it an & # 8217 ; listen to the rain comin & # 8217 ; down on the roof. ( mice, pg.14 )
Small by small George gave up everything that mattered to him to guarantee the safety and felicity of Lennie. George exposed himself and acted as a shield to protect him. & # 8220 ; You do bad things and I got to acquire you out. You brainsick son-of-a- bitch. You keep me in hot H2O all the time. & # 8221 ; ( mice, pg.11 ) When George kills Lennie in the decision of Of Mice and Men, he besides loses a portion of himself. He ended Lennie & # 8217 ; s life to protect him from the suffering life he was about to face. To kill Lennie was in the best involvement of both George and Lennie: & # 8220 ; He ain & # 8217 ; t no good to you. An & # 8217 ; he ain & # 8217 ; t no good to himself. & # 8221 ; ( mice, pg.44 ) Pulling the trigger on his comrade, his best friend, his other half, was the greatest gift George could of all time give him. He made certain that his last ideas were blissful 1s: & # 8220 ; Look down at that place across the river, like you can about see the topographic point { their dream } & # 8221 ; . ( mice, pg.106 ) Because of the powerful bond between George and Lennie, George was driven to excel the bounds of friendly relationship. & # 8220 ; I believe everything you do bad comes back to you. So everything that I do that & # 8217 ; s bad, I & # 8217 ; m traveling to endure for it. But in my bosom, I believe what i & # 8217 ; m making is right. So I feel like I & # 8217 ; m traveling to heaven. ( Tupac Amur Shakur ) . This illustrates the conflicting feelings that George was traveling through. He knew it was & # 8220 ; bad & # 8221 ; to kill Lennie. But in his bosom he knew it was right and that he was making Lennie a favor and would be forgiven, be it by God, or Lennie.
Steinbeck uses G
eorge and Lennie to metaphorically stand for powerful human relationships that go far beyond friendly relationship. The human race is continuously seeking for a connexion of the psyche, like the one George and Lennie had. If it is non through the bond of friendly relationship, so they are looking to fulfill this demand through their relationships with lovers, or parents and kids. To happen such a bond frequently takes many old ages, decennaries or a life-time. In many instances it is ne’er genuinely found. If and when 1 does stop this type of relationship and it is threatened, one will try to continue it even if it means through drastic steps.
On a much larger graduated table, Steinbeck depicts the compassion felt between work forces all over the universe through the societal construction of the migrators in The Grapes of Wrath. The migratory people, while devastated by hungriness and poorness, ever found a manner to make out to others and maintain on giving. While non deliberately seeking for one, the migratory people were given a common bond ; they were given the thrust to last: & # 8220 ; Why Tom & # 8211 ; us people will travel on livin & # 8217 ; when all them people is gone. Why Tom, we & # 8217 ; re the people that live. They ain & # 8217 ; t gon na pass over us out. Why, we & # 8217 ; re the people & # 8211 ; we go on. ( Grapes, pg.280 )
These migratory people went far above and beyond the call of responsibility. They reached beyond their immediate household & # 8217 ; s demands in order to assist others. Food rations were little and occupations were scarce, but the restrictions were surpassed by the unselfish nature of 1000s of work forces contending the same conflict. For illustration, Ma Joad rationed her household & # 8217 ; s nutrient into even smaller parts so that she would hold some leftovers to feed the starved kids: & # 8220 ; I can & # 8217 ; t send & # 8216 ; em off. I & # 8217 ; ll allow them hold what & # 8217 ; s lef & # 8217 ; . & # 8221 ; ( Grapes, pg.257 ) . Likewise, occupations were steadily diminishing. Yet, one time once more Steinbeck created characters who would exceed these bounds: & # 8220 ; Maybe I shouldn & # 8217 ; T, but- yeah, I & # 8217 ; ll state ya. Chap came through an & # 8217 ; he says they & # 8217 ; s gon na be work up norht. & # 8221 ; ( Grapes, pg. 259 ) . Although the adult male knew stating others about work could potentially diminish his wage that he so desperatly needed, he sacrifices for his fellow adult male so that he excessively could eat. Equally much as one is moved by the little of these people througout the novel, the stoping still comes as daze. It is an illustration of one of the most moving and generous Acts of the Apostless that a individual is capable of making: & # 8221 ; She moved easy to the bed and stood looking down at the otiose face, into the broad scared eyes. Then easy she lay down beside him. He shook his caput easy from side to side. Rose of Sharon loosened one side of the cover and bared her chest. & # 8220 ; You got to. & # 8221 ; She said. She squirmed closer and pulled his caput near. & # 8220 ; There. & # 8221 ; She said. & # 8220 ; There. & # 8221 ; ( Grapes, pg. 455 ) .
Rose of Sharon gives the old starvation adult male the gift she could non give her babe ; she gave the old adult male life.
Steinbeck uses the powerful friendly relationship of George and Lennie and the societal construction of the Migrants to picture the limitless stretches one would travel for his fellow adult male once a deep connexion has been made. In The Grapes of Wrath, he presents this thought on a big graduated table, with a big group of people who bond closely through compassion, understanding and the desire to last. On the other manus, in Of Mice and Men, he presents one & # 8217 ; s dedication to his fellow adult male on a more personal degree. Steinbeck brings the nature of humanity to the limelight and exposes the ferocious values it posesses.
JAMES SHELLARD
Bibliography
Of mice and work forces. toilet Steinbeck.
Grapes of Wrath. John Steinbeck
363
