Psychodynamic Personality Theories Essay

Free Articles

Contemporary society is intrigued with the impression of human behaviour as it expresses itself in our personality. Psychoanalytical theoretical account is most celebrated for introverted schemes such as deepness interviewing and projective techniques. which have emanated from its theoretical position. Classical psychoanalytic conceptualisation approached the survey of character or personality in two really different ways. each deducing from an early theoretical theoretical account of single development. In the epoch of Freud’s original thrust theory. an effort was made to understand personality on the footing of arrested development.

Subsequently with the development of self-importance psychological science. character was conceived as showing the operation of peculiar manners of defence. This 2nd manner of understanding character was non in struggle with the first ; it provided a different set of thoughts and metaphors for groking what was meant by a type of personality ( Magnavita. 2002 ) . The modern-day psychodynamic theoretical account of personality is really popular. peculiarly with clinical practicians. and offers much that is utile for gestating personality and personal upsets.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The strength of this theoretical account seems to lie in the power of many of its cardinal concepts. such as the unconscious. defence systems. and the relation among component personality constructions. It is difficult to conceive of a psychological science of personality without some mention to these and other concepts. The restrictions of this theoretical account are many. Unfortunately. after old ages of perpetuating itself in a closed system. a crisis developed about the viability of this theoretical account.

Another draw back is the inclination to shun empirical research. which would hold established wider scientific credence. For many. the conceptualisations and esoteric linguistic communication make it hard to plunge oneself in what seems a dogmatic intellectualized system for those who hide behind linguistic communication. In decision cognizing where to about put an person on the structural continuum is every bit much a clinical art as a scientific discipline. Reference Magnavita. J. J. ( 2002 ) . Theories of personality: modern-day attacks to the scientific discipline of personality. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out