The issue of coming up with ways to battle terrorist act has been prioritized by the full community internationally and it is besides a major undertaking in the United Nations. Assorted UN organic structures have come up with different enterprises to seek and battle terrorist act and convey to justice those involved with the act. The most controversial issue within the UN in its conflict against terrorist act is the antagonistic terrorist act steps that are stipulated in the declarations of the UN Security Council.

One of the most serious menaces towards human rights in the universe is terrorist act as it takes lives of 1000s of guiltless people every twelvemonth and besides breaks democratic orders. It is rather of import for Countries to respond to any menace of terrorist act but at the same clip there have been concerns that some forceful steps against terrorist act may besides greatly violate the human rights. The UN requires equilibrating the two viing involvements in the battle against terrorist act which are single rights on one manus and protection of civilian and national security on the other manus.

In some exceeding fortunes to control menaces and activities of terrorist act there may be some justification to the maltreatment of human rights but merely when it is an exigency instance. It is really of import for any state to guarantee that any determinations that are made in order to continue national security are harmonizing to the jurisprudence. compensation is done to persons whose rights were violated and those determinations should be subjected to reexamine in the close hereafter to avoid misdemeanor of human rights.

The UN did non do any effort to restart or resuscitate the attempts that the League of Nations had made to command international terrorist act after these regulations were greatly interrupted by the Second World War. These attempts had finished the integrating of the 1973 complementary conventions to cover with the penalty and bar of terrorist act and besides the constitution of an International Criminal Court. This has resulted in a job of international terrorist act as it has been observed in a figure of actions that have been carried out by the UN affecting progressive development and codification of the international jurisprudence since the early 1950s.

Before the twelvemonth 1972 the issue of terrorist act was non a major subject of treatment in the general assembly of the UN. In 1972 there was a snatch of Israeli jocks at Munich during the Olympic Games. as this was seen as an act of terrorist act. the so Secretary-General of the UN introduced an point on steps to control terrorist act and any sort of force that would take guiltless lives or jeopardize any human cardinal freedom to be discussed in the 27th session of the United Nations National Assembly.

In 1985 the General Assembly of the UN pointed out that there may be some instances in which the culprits may be pushed to terrorist Acts of the Apostless by misdemeanor of the human rights ; it besides urged States and the UN organs to do parts to the progressive riddance of any causes implicit in international terrorist act. Sri Lanka is one of the illustrations where the UN failed to contend terrorist act ; this is clear in that the Sri Lanka authorities was able to cut down the LTTE power from being a formidable organisation to a second-rate organisation.

The LTTE is one of the most barbarous and pitiless terrorist groups that can utilize any arm to do mass devastation of belongings and loss of life. The UN took no action to seek and convey to an terminal the LTTE group of terrorists but fortuitously the Rajapaksa authorities succeeded in get the better ofing the LTTE. The chief aim of the UN is to settle differences between states by usage of diplomatic attacks before the states decide to utilize military force or before the struggle becomes unmanageable. Unfortunately the UN has non attained this end. The UN is a forum where member provinces send representatives to reason for or against their states.

These representatives have been seen to be merely spokesmen for their state but back in their state they do non hold any power or influence. Another issue is that those states that are ruled by dictators or those that are non at peace use the UN debates to detain and perplex issues in their favor. Over the last 50 old ages during the being of the UN the arguments have non resolved any issues but menaces. direct military action and concealed dialogues that were non sponsored by the UN have had positive alterations in work outing most of the struggles.

An illustration of this is the instance of Iraq which was under the UN forces for over 100 old ages during which the Iraqi people were subjected to agonies while on the other manus Saddam Hussein continued with his dirty games with the UN of merely leting review of arms of mass devastation at certain periods and besides coming up with solutions to the oil for nutrient understanding imposed by the UN. This deadlock was broken by the United States of America by occupying and subverting the Saddam government.

Had this deadlock non been broken the people of Iraq would still be under the oppressive regulation of Saddam. The UN has besides been unable to take actions that are direct and independent without seeking the support of its members. In the current universe which is full of oppressive governments and war mongering dictators who understand that the UN lacks any existent power therefore doing them free to make anything they want. For illustration the North Korea has been proving atomic arms and it has presently threatened to make it once more while the UN is merely sing an act of countenances.

If North Korea today decides to utilize the atomic arms in an act of terrorist act many people would stop up losing their lives merely because the UN failed to take action in clip. The member States of the UN should so be urged to lend equal military force or money that is tantamount. The UN should so hold these resources at its disposal and it should be free to utilize it without any blessing from any of its member provinces. There are 5 selected member states of the UN that can differ on any determination that the bulk of the States had agreed upon.

These states are China. USA. Russia. United Kingdom and France because they founded the UN that came up with the regulations of UN after the Second World War. This has resulted in a batch of jobs in the UN because these states with the veto power were non elected democratically and hence there is ground to believe that the determinations that the states take are genuinely biased. This is a job that has greatly caused people in this universe to lose lives and it is non aimed to come to an terminal any clip shortly because the states with the veto power are non willing to give up this power and let for just choice.

The other failure of the UN is that most of its members are non states geared towards peace and have questionable vote patterns. The lone solution to work out this job would be to deny such states the power to voting during any meetings of the UN. This is non easy to implement because states debate in the UN forum merely if they have the right to vote in the UN Security Council. UN considers itself a human-centered organic structure while on the other manus it continues leting non-humanitarian states like China to vote on human-centered issues.

The other country where the UN has failed to take action on terrorist act is by the fact that UN does non officially acknowledge any State as a terrorist. Terrorists on the other manus would non debate in a public forum like the UN or seek aid from the UN to screen out their issues and this clearly shows that the UN does non acquire involved in any manner with the terrorists. Due to this the UN has been seen to be wholly blind to terrorists and it has no purposes of turn toing the terrorists and this is non likely to alter shortly.

UN being the largest organisation in the universe that promotes peace should non be wholly unable to turn to terrorist act and therefore this has been seen as a complete failure to the UN in contending terrorist act. The United Nations has besides been seen to neglect in the action against terrorist act because it has for a long clip been unable to clearly specify terrorist act without seting policies that would rag some of its strongest member provinces.

UN has found itself in a province of confusion as Islamic provinces argue that the battle against business should be exempted from the definition of terrorist act as this is good stipulated by the UN in the Organization of Islamic Conference ( OIC ) of 1998 which clearly states that the battle of the people either peaceable or armed battles against any foreign business shall non be termed as an act of force. The issue of terrorist act as been complicated more by the fact that the battle of the people to liberate themselves from any foreign business and/or colonialism does non in any manner constitute an act of terrorist act.

Some of the Islam churchmans have besides considered the presence of the US and other foreign forces in Afghanistan and Iraq as business and hence they do non term any act of the citizens of this state to liberate themselves from foreign business as an act of terrorist act. Due to miss of a definition of terrorist act there has been failure of the UN to come up with a complete elaborate convention on international terrorist act but alternatively it has adopted a papers it calls Global Counter Terrorism Strategy which is based on an unknown definition of terrorist act.

In decision the UN has failed in many countries in the battle against terrorist act. For the UN to contend terrorist act globally it should be in a place to turn to terrorists and come up with ways of forestalling any longer loss of lives. The UN should besides understand that the terrorists are people who can be negotiated with and hence coming with a democratic solution for both sides. UN should besides halt affecting member provinces that are non human-centered in any human-centered issues. In general the World requires a stronger peace international constabulary who will be free to move without acquiring orders from any of the UN province members.

Mentions LIST

Giuseppe Nesi. Contributor Giuseppe Nesi ( 2006 ) International cooperation in antagonistic terrorist act: the United Nations and regional organisations in the battle against terrorist act ( Published by Ashgate Publishing. Ltd. . ) . 2006 P. 47-48 Leel Pathirana. Failure to understand the struggle by UN and the West has created a human-centered Crisis. Asiatic Tribune. pp. 1-3. 18-4-2009. Available at & lt ; Asiantribune. com & gt ; M. Sassoli ( 2004 ) . usage and maltreatment of Torahs of war in the war on terrorist act jurisprudence and equality. A diary of theory and pattern. vol.

22. 2004. pp. 195-213 Maogoto. Jackson Nyamuya. Walking an International Tightrope: Use of Military Force to Counter Terrorism – Willing the End. Brooklyn Journal of International Law. Vol. 31. No. 2. 2006. Patrick Goodenough. International Editor. UN Anti-Terror Effort Bogged Down Over Terrorism Definition. Tuesday. September 02. 2008. ( CNSNews. com ) Phil for humanity. A usher for the endurance of world. and bettering the universe. society and yourself. why the United Nations is a useless failure. available online at & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. philforhumanity. com & gt ;