Julius Caesar was the emperor of the Roman democracy. As a powerful political and military figure. Caesar established the Roman Republic as one of the greatest civilisation of the clip. He was subsequently assassinated as a secret plan by the senate. go forthing the democracy in pandemonium. Julius Caesar’s blackwash was carried out his ain senate. There was a confederacy against him that involved his best friend. Marcus Junius Brutus. He was assassinated on Idess of March. His blackwash came as fright raged in the senate that due to his absolutism he could subvert the senate into a dictatorship.

This might non hold taken topographic point. but unluckily for his bravos. things did non turn out the manner they had expected. If Caesar has lived. the democracy would non hold gone into struggles that led to the autumn of the democracy ( Osgood. p. 18 ) . This paper is a treatment on what would likely hold happened if Caesar was non assassinated. If Caesar had non been assassinated the pandemonium that emanated in Rome after his decease would non hold happened. The Liberator’s civil war would hold been avoided has Caesar non been assassinated. The Roman Republic would non hold become the Roman Empire.

The Roman Empire was born after the autumn of the Roman Republic that followed the blackwash of Caesar. Probably one twenty-four hours the democracy would hold ended. but decidedly non every bit fast as it occurred with the decease of Caesar ( Parenti. p. 48 ) . Julius Caesar’s blackwash ended his good work as a military leader and respectable politician. Had he non been assassinated he would hold continued to derive power in Rome. Even before his blackwash he has become so powerful and had begun to be a dictator. Though a dictator he was loved by the Romans.

It is as a consequence of this love and regard that people made destructive political determinations. They ne’er had any jobs with him as their leader. This leader has brought great prosperity to Rome. His military strength had brought in more power and land. which increased the strength and size of the imperium. If he had lived. this powerful leader would hold continued with his enterprises of greater success of Rome ( Osgood. p. 28 ) . Possibly if Caesar had non been killed. the leading of the democracy would hold taken another way after his natural decease.

Before his decease. he had named his great-nephew. Gaius Octavian. his lone inheritor. If had lived longer Octavian would non hold assumed power at the age of 18. He would hold been leader when he gained the leading or possibly person else would hold taken it. Though Octavian proved to be a strong politician. it was the blackwash that brought him to power at such an early age. This power and the love from the society that adore his great uncle had a negative consequence of the immature Octavian ( Stone. p. 123 ) .

If Caesar had non been assassinated the senate would hold retained the democratic society. as was its nonsubjective. Despite the fact that Caesar had become a dictator. the senate had managed to hold in topographic point a democratic society. If he had non been killed. it would hold taken long for the democracy to go a monarchy. This is what happened after his decease and accession to power of his great nephew. The changing of the democracy into a sovereign would non hold occurred fast because the people would still hold assurance with the senate.

The deficiency of assurance with the senate was contributed by the blackwash of Caesar. As a consequence it was really easy to alter the authorities. Despite the fact that Caesar was a dictator his life would hold seen the society remain a democratic 1. Because of the people’s love for his replacement. he became a greater dictator that his great uncle of all time was. If he had survived. the power would non hold gone into the custodies of a immature adult male who ended up acquiring corrupted by the power and love from the society ( Zoch. p. 217 ) . The decease of Caesar was the cause of the fast terminal to the Roman civilisation.

Had he lived. this would likely ne’er have occurred. or would hold taken a longer clip to take topographic point. Probably if the emperor had survived. the democracy would hold remained a civilisation for really many centuries. It was his blackwash that started a Domino consequence that led to the autumn of the civilisation. The sovereign that the people had so much wanted gave a batch of power to the emperors who followed and made them to mistreat power. The senate would hold persisted if Caesar was non assassinated ( Osgood. p. 20 ) . This would intend less power to the emperors.

Lack of another organic structure that would modulate the power of the emperor. they ended up mistreating the power and misapplying what had taken a batch of clip and strength to set up. It is this much pulverization that led to the autumn of Rome. Romans were in demand of a sovereign led by Caesar. but due to his blackwash. they received a sovereign ruled by greedy emperors. The autumn of Rome was quickened by the society that loved Caesar and wanted to keep on to him as their male monarch ( Stone. p. 193 ) . Decision If Caesar was non assassinated. the Roman Republic would non hold fallen so fast.

Probably the civilisation would hold survived for many centuries. Possibly there could ne’er be anything like the Roman Empire that replaced the Roman Republic. The civilisation ended with the Domino consequence that followed the blackwash of Julius Caesar. This was because of the tremendous part he had made to the democracy and the pandemonium that followed his blackwash. His military and political strength. he made the republic one of the greatest civilisation of the clip. With the violent manner that he died. this marked the start of the terminal of the civilisation.