“Leadership is a procedure whereby an single influences a group of persons to accomplish a common goal” ( Northouse. 2012 ) . The scholar had to place and compare four theories of leading. The theories selected to analyse by the scholar are eventuality. behavioural. transmutation. and transactional. For a better apprehension of how these theories will suit into her coveted line of work. these theories must foremost be defined. Harmonizing to Northouse ( 2012 ) . “Contingency Theory is a leader-matched theory that tries to fit leaders to allow state of affairss to suit the leader’s context ( as cited by Fiedler and Chemers. 1974 ) .

Contingency theory depends on the thought that a leader ability to work out a state of affairs depends on certain given factors. There is non one specific leading manner that a leader can use to every state of affairs. Whenever a factor is presented. the leader must alter his leading manner. Dependent upon the state of affairs. a leader may win or neglect. Behavioral theory assumes that leaders are made and non born and focuses on the certain behaviours of leaders. Behavioral theoreticians believe that successful leading can be learned and defined by the leader’s actions. Leaderships normally have a specific response to a specific state of affairs and this is because people believe that a leader can be conditioned or learn how to respond. For illustration. the President of the United States can non move out violently towards a individual that may hold been murdered in his immediate household. He would hold to larn how to command himself in the eyes of the populace.

Ideas of revenge and disgusting linguistic communication in forepart of equals would non be tolerated. “Transformational leading theory is a procedure that alterations and transforms people” ( Northouse. 2012 ) . It deals with the leader’s emotions that motivates their followings to move with those same feelings and work toward a common end. Leaderships get their followings involved by seting them in the head with them to stand out to the following degree. They show them they are separately considered and acknowledge them for their committedness and difficult work. Whenever a leader is able to enthusiastically listen and demo a sense of public demand. it will construct a relationship bond that will raise the degree of motive and morality in both the leader and the follower. The last theory analyzed was the Transactional leading theory. He stated. “Transactional leading theory focuses on the exchanged that occur between the leader and the follower” ( Northouse. 2012 ) . When utilizing transactional theory. there is normally wagess and/or penalties issued depending on the public presentation of the followings. If the end is accomplished and is favourable to the leader. the follower is normally rewarded.

If it is less than successful. some type of penalty may be rendered. An illustration of the transactional leading theory is when a constabulary officer possibly pulls over a director from an electronic shop. alternatively of the officer giving the director a ticket ; he may accept a gift card from the director to utilize in the shop. This is besides unethical. In the learner’s current profession. she has chosen to utilize the Transformational leading theory. This theory is most influential because she is the laminitis of a non-profit charity. The organisation trades with people of all races. beginnings. ethnicities. and more. She is dedicated to assisting others without anticipating anything in return. When her followings see the kindness she possess it inspires them to volunteer to assist her range the ends of her organisation.