Steinbeck presents Candy as a vulnerable character. He does this by citing him as an “old man” before mentioning his name. utilizing pre-modification ; so that the reader immediately knows non merely his physical province but possibly that metaphorically he is a weak individual. He is besides shown to be despairing throughout the gap of chapter 2. where he tries to do friends with George and Lennie every bit shortly as he meets them. He gossips about other people on the spread and makes certain George “won’t tell Curley nothing” .

This quotation mark entirely indicates Candy is lonely and merely wants to hold friends but deep down is afraid of the other work forces on the spread. connoting he doesn’t have many friends on the spread at all. therefore he needs to be welcoming and confident towards George and Lennie to derive their friendly relationship but this quote gives off his fright of Curley happening out he was speaking about him and throwing him off the spread. taking the reader to believe the spread is the lone topographic point Candy can name place.

This thought of Candy being wholly entirely and holding no where else to travel is reinforced when Steinbeck introduces Candy’s “ancient dog” . the usage of pre-modification once more this clip with the word “ancient” helps to demo that like his proprietor this Canis familiaris is old. the lexis “ancient” has the intensions of being so old it could be considered an artefact or piece of history. this construct could propose that Candy’s Canis familiaris is in fact a portion of the history of the spread that is why he is still there because even though his Canis familiaris is old and useless he is still allowed on the spread even with no intent. merely like Candy remaining on the spread with no manus. significance he can non make any proper occupations except “settin’ out the wash basins” .

However when Steinbeck introduces the Canis familiaris at first. Candy says “my dog” . this genitive lexis could propose Candy is proud of his Canis familiaris particularly as he goes on to state “he was a good shepherd dog when he was younger” . you could take this quotation mark as a declaratory. him protecting but besides boasting about his Canis familiaris. A conflicting thought could be that Candy and Canis familiaris are similar that is why Candy likes to speak and boast about his Canis familiaris. Steinbeck writes for both that they are “old” and “ancient” but both are disabled in that Candy has lost his manus and the Canis familiaris is so old and decrepit it can non run or feed itself. Both are looking for a comrade that could take attention of them. they have a codependent relationship.

This thought could be considered a repeating subject as some say Lennie and Georges’ relationship is co-dependent. even though George wouldn’t admit it due to his commanding personality. So the ground Candy brags about his Canis familiaris is because he truly wants to turn out himself. and that he was in fact worthy of being on the spread. This point of Candy and his Canis familiaris being similar supports my original thought. which was that utilizing the descriptions of Candy and his Canis familiaris we find that Candy is in fact merely like an old animate being. a utile and valued member of any spread as opposed to merely something that takes up infinite. money and nutrient.